TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

don't Timing belt changes in 1.8Ts make up for the difference in cost for a 3.2 TT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2009, 03:23 PM
  #11  
AudiWorld Super User
 
AudiMick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 5,138
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As long as you never need to replace the transmission you will be fine!

I guess there's an issue with the "Mechatronic Control Module" that Audi is running away from in their normal manner until the lawyers get at them.

I would never own a CVT or DSG Audi. When the cars get to high miles they are an expensive maintenance problem. There's pretty much no-one who can fix them except the dealer.

And the dealers answer seems to be "replace the transmission".

At least the Tiptronic's are sorta OK, albeit nowhere as reliable as the manuals.
Old 05-05-2009, 08:55 PM
  #12  
AudiWorld Super User
 
M power this!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

chain guides in the VR6s, as mentioned will need to be replaced! not free. the DSG is undoubtably more expensive over 150k to upkeep than the 6spd stick.

and if you're getting a TT for cheap maintainence, get ready to say, "Whaaaat?"

this doesn't even go into the rotors are more expensive, pads are more, etc. and modding of course makes the 1.8t a no brainer.
Old 05-06-2009, 09:14 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
Big turbo TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes,the mechatronics in the DSG 1st version are crap,stay away from DSG unless you want expensive repair bills later.
I am on the opposite end of the spectrum,I have the RARE FWD 1.8T coupe 5 speed with 460bhp,keep it simple!!
Old 05-07-2009, 06:46 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
 
Drollomite Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Do you know this for a fact?

I own an '05 3.2 with nearly 50k, and have not experienced any DSG problems so far. A number of other Mk1 DSG owners on this forum have reported similar reliability. Will that hold up over extended miles? Don't think we know that just yet. There might be an issue with the S tronic on the Mk2, and the '08 R32 as well, as several owners have experienced intermittent failure attributed to the mechatronic unit. Then again, more and more DSG/S tronic cars are on the road, so you would expect to hear about more problems. I would be cautious about making generalizations, especially without firsthand knowledge.
Old 05-07-2009, 09:13 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
TTmini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

same here 2005 DSG 3.2 TT, no DSG issues, 55,000 miles.
Old 05-13-2009, 06:34 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Member
 
challett55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm in the process of changing my timing belt on my 2000 tt right now. It has 145k on it and as far as I can tell it's never been changed before. It also has a timing chain. It drives the cams from the other end. I may change that as well.
Old 05-18-2009, 02:23 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
 
JettaRedII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by challett55
I'm in the process of changing my timing belt on my 2000 tt right now. It has 145k on it and as far as I can tell it's never been changed before. It also has a timing chain. It drives the cams from the other end. I may change that as well.
Whoa! The chain on the 1.8T is only to turn the cams! You do not need to (and should not) replace it.
Old 05-18-2009, 08:10 PM
  #18  
AudiWorld Member
 
Geomeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 349
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Just a few points to make. 3.2 litre engines are more expensive in fuel costs.

And someone said something about timing chain conversion kit...It's not the timing belt that goes in the tt's it's the tensioner that breaks down first. You might just want to look more into using a different material for the tensioner.
Old 05-19-2009, 03:02 PM
  #19  
Rest In Peace
 
TTinCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 24,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default As with any car>>>

it is difficult to predict failure. Trying to rationalize timing belts over the coarse of 180K (w/60k intervals) and a "mere" 1000$ per repair is probably not wise. You will probably spend more on tires in that time if you really drive it...

1.8t has way more mods and upside on it than the 3.2......just my impression...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
belizebrian
1.8T Discussion
4
09-25-2012 12:46 PM
MikekiM@PureMS
TT (Mk1) Discussion
0
11-08-2008 12:43 PM
LiTTespeed
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
3
01-09-2008 03:22 AM
mosmoe (OPG)
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
13
06-22-2007 05:50 PM
sna
TT (Mk1) Discussion
3
01-18-2003 05:52 PM



Quick Reply: don't Timing belt changes in 1.8Ts make up for the difference in cost for a 3.2 TT?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM.