A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

Bosch Motorsports 5 Bar FPR vs. Bosch 4 Bar modified to be 5 Bar (attn: Shawfm)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2007, 04:11 PM
  #1  
Pat
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bosch Motorsports 5 Bar FPR vs. Bosch 4 Bar modified to be 5 Bar (attn: Shawfm)

Did some comparison logging between the two FPRs today with Rusty's help. With the crushed 4 bar regulator at 3000 RPM my O2 voltage was .840. With the true Bosch Motorsports regulator in the same scenario it was .860. There IS a difference.
Also, boost at 6200 RPM was 7 psi with the crushed FPR, while with the motorsports regulator it was 10 psi at the same engine speed.
Between 5K and 6K I was getting more fuel in there with the motorsports FPR as evidenced by avg O2 voltage of .875 vs .865.
Old 05-27-2007, 06:41 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
1heartaudiworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what did you do to verify that your new crushed fpr was at "5" bar?

If you have a real bosch 5 bar the best thing to do would be to test the actual pressure of the 5 bar and then crush the 4 bar to that level.
Old 05-27-2007, 07:04 PM
  #3  
Pat
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AWE sold it as a crushed 5 bar. I did not measure it myself.
Old 05-27-2007, 08:41 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
1heartaudiworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hmmm.. theirs were some of the better ones out there.

I worked there years ago (01-03) and we had a great rig for checking the pressure of them while they were being crushed.

What year is your car. Obviously it has a narrow band and that being said the voltages while they do change are pretty much useless to use even for comparison sakes.

I also don't fully understand the change in boost. If you have an AEB boost will be determined based on intake temps and mass air flow. If you have a later car boost is determined by the torque request so it would change.

That being said with more boost the car is going to increase the injector duty cycle on either an early or late motor, that would certainly result in different 02 sensor readings on a narrow band as they are highly inacurate.

On a car with a narrow band after about 4k its going to start to run open loop and not use the 02 sensor for really anything at all. The later cars with widebands stay in closed loop the whole time and try to hit their target AF.

The better test would have been to set boost with a manual boost controller, check AF with a wideband and also check injector duty cycle.
Old 05-28-2007, 04:23 AM
  #5  
Pat
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good info! Not sure what to tell you other than it's a 99.5, so it has an AEB.
Old 05-28-2007, 04:41 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
ModifiedA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 34,209
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default you should graph the two runs on top of each other.

also, the long term FTs might show some differences too.
Old 05-28-2007, 04:58 AM
  #7  
Pat
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: hmmm.. theirs were some of the better ones out there.

(from Rusty):

You're correct about the narrowband O2, to a point. They are lousy to measure absolute A/F ratio, but the sensors themselves are pretty self-consistent, so a .01 volt difference in the "tuning" range (~.865) is notable.

Injector duty cycle is pegged at 16.32 msec, the limit for amerispec AEB engines.

Pat's MTM chip goes open loop just off idle. Yes, it really does, I've watched it using block 099.

Yes, the better test would have been to set boost with an MBC. One does what one has time to do... *sigh*

These results aren't conclusive, just an indicator. FWIW we did two runs, the first run was too rich (.890) and he had 2 lbs *less* boost @6000. I've logged a fair amount of data with his car, and I've *never* seen .89's, so I think it's reasonable to say he's getting a bit more fuel.
Old 05-28-2007, 06:20 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
shawfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Well they did say there was a difference. Now thanks to you I know what they said was true.

it makes me feel a lot better about spending the extra money on the 5 bar FPR.
Old 05-28-2007, 06:39 AM
  #9  
Pat
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fuel trims are +2.3/0.0
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoeS4
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
12
11-20-2007 03:08 PM
low rider
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
26
05-11-2005 08:11 AM
Casey
2.7T V6 Discussion
1
04-06-2005 12:15 AM
Steve66
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
6
11-08-2000 08:49 AM



Quick Reply: Bosch Motorsports 5 Bar FPR vs. Bosch 4 Bar modified to be 5 Bar (attn: Shawfm)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.