someone please respond: This WW with no warning is now a pain in the ass.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-27-2006, 01:35 PM

morecowbell

Senior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 6,167

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

someone please respond: This WW with no warning is now a pain in the ***.

when did the "no WW required" come in to affect? I've seen people banned for less than this. Is this the new AW policy where we don't have to warn anyone anymore cause I'll gladly post **** without warning.

Reply Like

06-27-2006, 01:36 PM

Tgr_Clw

AudiWorld Uber User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 43,023

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Only neilm and ADOBO are authorized to post WW w/o WW warning.

Reply Like

06-27-2006, 01:44 PM

morecowbell

Senior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 6,167

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

good for them, maybe they can hire me when i get canned. I thought....

this was a safe place to surf when work was slow but i guess that's changed.

Reply Like

06-28-2006, 07:20 AM

neilm

Guest

Join Date: Mar 2000

Posts: 11,191

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

The Terms of Use do not mention any WW rules

The Maxim test is all that exists.

Reply Like

06-30-2006, 07:40 AM

S4iowa

AudiWorld Expert

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 25,530

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Use the tools you have in Firefox. Tell it to only load pictures that

originate from the site you are on. That way it won't load pictures being hosted elsewere.

tools>options>content> originating site only

or turn of images entirely