DO NOT USE VW MAF - Page 2

Devious27t · 11-08-2004, 11:06 PM

i know i have tested it myself.

jprice@CPS · 11-09-2004, 08:07 AM

It's been done many times on 1.8Ts and 2.7Ts without issue.

Devious27t · 11-09-2004, 05:44 PM

of tuned with lemmiwinks or something like that and imo that is ghetto.... just shell out 45 more dollars and get the right maf remanufactured and fine tune it correctly rather than having to band aid the car from being cheap.

jprice@CPS · 11-09-2004, 06:03 PM

Nevermind.

Devious27t · 11-10-2004, 09:20 AM

or maybe the EGT sensor that only goes up to 995 degrees.

the point i am trying to make is that messing around with lemmiwinks while looking at your vag-com is not the way to calibrate an ecu to run a maf its not setup to run or much less tune a car to run perfectly with one. the vag-com gives you an idea of what is going on but not the whole story. most people on here buying the VW MAF arent going to have a wideband or anything needed to tune the A/F ratio correctly.

11-08-2004, 11:06 PM	#11
Devious27t Member Garage is empty, add now Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,632	the calibration values are still off and the g/s output will read lower all else equal i know i have tested it myself. __________________ all show. no go. stock 2001.5 S4 6 speed (12,400 miles) 333hp 2000 A4 1.8t quattro manual (sold) formerly Devious18t (retired 3/3/2006)

11-09-2004, 08:07 AM	#12
jprice@CPS Member Garage is empty, add now Join Date: Aug 2000 Posts: 13,131	Yes, it will read lower, but if you adjusted the fuel why would that matter? It's been done many times on 1.8Ts and 2.7Ts without issue. __________________ Minnesota Audi Club 2001.5 Audi A4 1.8TQMS APR Stage 3+, APR Exhaust, Eibach Pro Street Coilovers, Neuspeed 19mm rear sway.

11-09-2004, 05:44 PM	#13
Devious27t Member Garage is empty, add now Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,632	the ecu still takes the calibration into account.... you are talking about something just being kind of tuned with lemmiwinks or something like that and imo that is ghetto.... just shell out 45 more dollars and get the right maf remanufactured and fine tune it correctly rather than having to band aid the car from being cheap. __________________ all show. no go. stock 2001.5 S4 6 speed (12,400 miles) 333hp 2000 A4 1.8t quattro manual (sold) formerly Devious18t (retired 3/3/2006)

11-09-2004, 06:03 PM	#14
jprice@CPS Member Garage is empty, add now Join Date: Aug 2000 Posts: 13,131	Uhhh.. ok. Nevermind. __________________ Minnesota Audi Club 2001.5 Audi A4 1.8TQMS APR Stage 3+, APR Exhaust, Eibach Pro Street Coilovers, Neuspeed 19mm rear sway.

11-10-2004, 09:20 AM	#15
Devious27t Member Garage is empty, add now Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,632	you must judge your tuning solely on the cars narrow band sensor too.... or maybe the EGT sensor that only goes up to 995 degrees. the point i am trying to make is that messing around with lemmiwinks while looking at your vag-com is not the way to calibrate an ecu to run a maf its not setup to run or much less tune a car to run perfectly with one. the vag-com gives you an idea of what is going on but not the whole story. most people on here buying the VW MAF arent going to have a wideband or anything needed to tune the A/F ratio correctly. __________________ all show. no go. stock 2001.5 S4 6 speed (12,400 miles) 333hp 2000 A4 1.8t quattro manual (sold) formerly Devious18t (retired 3/3/2006)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode


Discussion Forums:

11-10-2004, 09:20 AM
AudiWorld Audi R8 Paid Advertisement