Go Back   AudiWorld Forums » Audi Models » Audi A6 / S6 / RS 6 » A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Notices

Discussion Forums:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-03-2005, 05:35 PM   #1
shatiras
New Member
Account #: 69334
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 65
Default Vacuum boost pump (breather hose) and oil leaks

Here is a real life story in case anyone has doubts about the faulty design of the vacuum boost pump which leads to failure of valve cover and camshaft adjuster seals:
I have a 2.8Q '99 A6 and about a week ago, on my way to work, smoke started coming form under the hood in massive quantities. It was so much that it got sucked into the ventilation system and filled the interior of the car. I stopped the car and with one look under the hood I could tell that it was oil leaking onto the exhaust on the passenger firewall side. I limped back home with the ventilation off and smoking so much it looked as if I was grilling hamburgers under the hood.
Having heard the stories about the vacuum boost pump (part number: 058 133 753 B) I disconnected it and determined that it was completely clogged on the side where the valve cover breather hose connects to it. I could neither blow any air in or out that side.
I reconnected the vacuum lines to it, but left the breather hose that comes from the valve covers disconnected and venting under the hood. The result: The massive oil leak stopped immediately, confirming that the blocked pump was causing back pressure to build up and blowing oil through teh seals.

Unfortunately the story does not have a completely happy ending. Even though the massive oil leak stopped, the damage was done and I had residual leaks from both valve covers and camshaft adjusters. I ended up having the valve cover and cam adjuster seals redone at my indy shop.

Currious fact: in order to release the replacement pump part to me indy shop, the dealer asked for a VIN number because they said there is a recall on these (I am not aware of any recall, but that's what my mecahnic was told).
We also cut up the old pump and found it completely gummed up and clogged. It is a very bad design because the passages are so small that they get blocked easily.
I have now put this part on 12 month 12,000 miles replacement schedule. It is easy to do (now that I replaced the calmps with regular hose clamps) and I rather spend the $30 bucks a year than risk another gasket blowout.
I would strongly suggest that folks test this pump. An easy way to do it is to just disconnect the valve cover breather hose at the pump (must cut off existing clamp and replace with regular hose clamp) and check for vacuum at the pump inlet. If no vacuum is felt, the pump is clogged.
shatiras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:19 PM   #3
KL'00-2.7T
New Member
Account #: 8432
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 171
Default Is this a problem with the 2.7T engine as well? If so, where is this pump/tube located? TIA

KL'00-2.7T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:29 PM   #4
not.bitter
New Member
Account #: 83840
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 141
Default too bad the guy who broke that story was driven from AWA6 by overzelous Mods

just think how much he could add about clucthes, tires, even having AoA extend the warranty on transmissions for an extra 12/12

pity
not.bitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:51 PM   #5
JimR
Member
Account #: 1018
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 46,941
Default Yes. top of engine, just forward of the firewall.

I need to do a post of links on this, that puts everything in one post.
JimR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 06:56 PM   #7
shatiras
New Member
Account #: 69334
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 65
Default It depends....

According to ETKA, the APB engine with the manual transmission does not have a booster pump. The APB engine with automatic transmission has a different pump (part # 078 133 701 L), I am not sure if this one is prone to the same problems.

The AHA, ATQ (2.8) and ART (4.2) all have the same pump (the one that is problematic).
shatiras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 07:26 PM   #8
Potomac-Greg
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 18626
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 21,866
Default Maybe if we beg, he'll come back. Imagine a guy being banned for solving problems!

__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Mine: 2002 Mercedes Benz C32 / ///AMG
Family Choo Choo: 2008 MB GL320 CDI
Track Ho: 1988 Porschuh 944
Recent History: Audi 2002 TT Roadster
History: Audi 2000 A6 2.7T
Ancient History: Audi 1991 90Q 20V
Potomac-Greg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 08:49 PM   #9
Cargasm2.7
Member
Account #: 56988
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,210
Default I'd guess he'd be bitter.

__________________
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Yukon/Camaro/Corvette
"The"
Cargasm2.7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 07:27 AM   #10
TXurS6
Member
Account #: 9795
 
TXurS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,277
Default lol and the guy had a sweet disposition to boot

ahhh, the days when there was actually a little drama around here.
__________________
Jim
formerly FtWorthS4

1997 S6
TXurS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
078, 133, 27, 701, ad, aoa, audi, breather, cdi, check, disconnected, engine, hose, mercedes, recall



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Discussion Forums:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community

Contact Us - AudiWorld - Archive - Top