Go Back   AudiWorld Forums » Audi Models » Audi S4 / RS4 » S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Notices

Discussion Forums:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-15-2006, 05:36 PM   #1
Godfather | Jay
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 99226
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,267
Default 100 octane data - AMS vs APR (100 octane program) Stage 2...

First off, I want to say that for some reason I've noticed that AMS takes forever to regulate the RPMs when I first turn on the car. They hang around 1300 and the car will drive itself in 2nd gear - no need to hit the gas - until it warms up. APR brings the RPMs down very quickly. Weird.

Now to the data. I filled up with a full tank of Sunoco 100 ($4.29/gallon). I didn't give either one much time to adapt - just drove long enough to warm up, then did a couple WOT runs before logging. APR's timing was impressive across the rev range as you'd expect from the octane specific program. AMS seemed to be learning and might have closed the gap a tad more given time. AMS had to deal with higher humidity.

What I've learned from this is just how much of a difference ambient conditions make. In colder, dryer air, I pulled better FATS numbers on 93 (4.7x on AMS). FATS runs always need to be taken with a grain of salt - dry air, low pressure, etc are huge.

Godfather | Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 05:47 PM   #2
B5QShip
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 78120
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,743
Default Those MAF numbers make baby jesus cry. I'm surprised a small elevation & some humidity

gives such sh!tty #'s. Something doesn't seem quite right to me...
__________________
B5QShip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 05:50 PM   #3
Godfather | Jay
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 99226
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,267
Default Best I've ever had in perfect conditions is a peak of 254ish. That was a series of

4.7ish runs - data in picposter.
Godfather | Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 05:55 PM   #4
Godfather | Jay
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 99226
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,267
Default I think a-boxes (Bosch) reads lower, too...

Godfather | Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 09:56 PM   #5
Swank4
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 41738
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 6,760
Send a message via Yahoo to Swank4
Default A couple of things...

1. My AMS idles just fine. 30 seconds after startup it settles down from 1300 rpm to just below 1000. You must have a glitch in the ECU or your elevation is causing issues (I'm at sea level). My MAF hits 270 g/s.

2. In my experience AMS runs WORSE on 100 than it does on 96-97. DarinS4 showed WAY back that AMS adapts up to about 97 but not well beyond that. I ran FATS with 100 octane and it was slower than 96 octane (I chose 96 because it was an even mix of 100/91). With 96 I would get timing to hit 20 degrees. APR might adapt better to the 100...but comparative speed might be the same.

3. FATS for me was 4.7 at sea level, 60F, 50% humidity, 96 octane.
__________________
2001 S4 avant / RS6-K04 turbos / ASP custom tuning / Fast Intentions 3" downpipes / AWE Twin2 exhaust / AWE ICs / Aquamist HFS-5 / SPEC 3+ clutch / Stasis Motorsports (Ohlins) 700F/800R / Stasis Alcon 355 BBK, 298 rears / H-sport rear sway / Stasis 4:1 rear diff / Zeitronix wideband O2 / FATS = 3.35 on 91 octane / Land & Sea dyno = 429 whp.
Swank4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Discussion Forums:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community

Contact Us - AudiWorld - Archive - Top