|
Sign in using an external account
|
|
|||||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
I've seen several injector duty cycle logs of K04 based turbo cars (straight K04s and assorted K04 hybrids) running 440cc/min injectors @ 4bar. Many had duty cycles over 100% and a select few had 02 voltages leaning out up top as duty cycles continued to rise. With that said, ASP claims to use 440cc/min injectors @ 4bar on their GT25 kit. I'm curious how the ASP GT25 kit can make much more power than these K04 based cars mentioned above if the injectors are one of the limiting factors. Thanks for any insight you guys can give on the subject. I'm looking for an infomational thread addressing my question so PLEASE don't turn this into a flame war as this was not my intention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Audiworld Sponsor
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 19,700
|
The ASP car maintained an excellent AFR with good duty cycles on those 42# injectors. Quite impressive.
-Dave Pramanik |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,745
|
Honestly we were not expecting the amount of fuel to be adequate. By all calculations the BSFC is on the low side approx. 0.5@100%, 0.55@105%DC
Happy tooning! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
AudiWorld Super User
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,096
|
I think the leaning out was more of a software issue in it's dealing with accelerative loads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,996
|
It seems as though the addition of a higher flow fuel pump on the list of parts for the ASP kit is an attempt to up overall delivery.
So if pressure is presumably upped by a high flow fuel pump and injector pulse width is increased it would seem that a relationship between load based pulse width and injector firing syncronized with intake valve actuation might stretch some of the generalizations established with typical injector sizing. I agree that 600chp seems a bit much for the 510cc delivery.
__________________
.......balance and focus before power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,020
|
I can't remember off the top of my head. And what would the theoretical ceiling be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 826
|
these cars are capable of much more power if you just simply get the IATs DOWN and the timing up. one good way to do this is not having a fine oil mist in the intake anymore because that causes detonation due to the fuels octane level being deminished and lots of thermal coatings and heat wraps.
440 are fine for lots of stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
AudiWorld Super User
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 17,943
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 100, 18t, 440cc, 510, 510cc, 600cc, bar, ccmin, epl, flow, fpr, hp, injector, injectors, injetors, support |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community








</a>


Linear Mode
