Go Back   AudiWorld Forums » Audi Models » Audi S4 / RS4 » S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Notices

Discussion Forums:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-13-2005, 02:03 PM   #1
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default Thanks again to RyanS4 and others that recommended raceshopper.com for Ferodo pads...

Finally got around to ordering them, DS2500s, just now ($85 shipped).

1 question for Ryan or anyone else in the know:

RYoung's brake pad write-up says that stock pads have a coefficient of friction probably ~.35 and the DS2500s have a coefficient of friction ~.50. How much will the bias change?
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 02:10 PM   #2
ryans4
Senior Member
Account #: 4359
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,314
Default if you run the same compound front and rear, it won't (assuming stock is the same f/r)...

but if you just loaded a .5 rear and kept a .35 front, then it's a pretty good change.

If you refer to the long drawn out "brake force" calculations, you see that at the end of all the math "crap", you multiply the result by the CF of the pad.

So say for ease of sake, the front made 2000 "units" and the rear made 1000 "units".

Front pad is a .35 CF = 2000 * .35 = 700 units
Rear pad was a .35 CF = 1000 * .35 = 350 units
F/R bias using my stoopid units is 66.67% front bias

new rear pad..
Front pad is a .35 CF = 2000 * .35 = 700 units
Rear pad is a .5 CF = 1000 * .5 = 500 units
F/R bias using my stoopid units is 58.33% front bias

So you could say in my WAY over simplified example that the rear pad change had a bias affect of 8.34% to the rear.

I should have tweaked the stoopid units to mimick stock bias, but it's pretty close as is.

ok, now I welcome the math geeks to correct me.

on a side note, glad you had a good buying experience. Hope you like the DS2500's. Mine should go in an a couple weeks.
__________________
ryans4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 02:16 PM   #3
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default I meant only changing the rears. Thanks for the quick dirty math :)

If you want more specifics, I run 332mm Stoptechs up front. I use Axxis Ultimates on the street (coefficient of friction is .35 according to RYoung's write-up) and Pagid Orange at the track (coefficient of friction on this pad is .52 according to RYoung's write-up). So basically with the Pagids up front, the bias will be almost stock-like (a touch more up front?) and with the Axxis up front, the bias will be ~10% more in the rear than stock!?
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 02:29 PM   #4
ryans4
Senior Member
Account #: 4359
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,314
Default you would be right *IF* you had stock front rotors/calipers, your 13" stoptech's...

...are known to shift a lot of bias to the rear (via smaller piston sizing) despite the larger then stock 332mm rotor (stock front is 321).

So for you, on the street (axis up front and DS2500 out back), it should be rear biased (more so then stoptech already rear biased you). On track (pagid orange up front and DS2500 out back) it will be damn close to waht stoptech invisioned with their kit assuming stock audi rear rotors/calipers.

Personally, i like the shift towards additional rear bias, i think it makes the car feel more stable under braking (despite the fact that it really isn't since over rear bias is what causes the oversteer or spin on rear lockup before fronts lockup). See if you notice the car take a "squat" more in heavy braking on the street.

or if you really want to see where your bias is given all the other parts of your car (suspension/tires/etc.), pull the ABS and lock them up and see what locks up first. But let me throw a caveat on that, it's not safe. I bet you'll like it, especially if you like the way your old man's P-Car brakes, it should be more like his car.
__________________
ryans4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 02:32 PM   #5
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default Thanks a bunch, man. You are so helpful, it's ridiculous. Seriously you rule Mr. SuperHeroStatusing.

PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 02:57 PM   #6
FixedWing
Senior Member
Account #: 66531
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,155
Default My only warning would be that with different pads you are going to get different rates of heating ..

and of overheating of the pads. The result could be one end fading before the other. And that could have some very dramatic results.

I had this happen with new RS-19 pads on the back of my Porsche. With Ceramic rotors it takes a *long* time to really break them in. The result was that the rears faded but because the fronts were still operating correctly I didn't know it. I ended up getting into ABS at the front (because that end was still working well) and overheated rears. It was quite the surprise which made me realise how little margin I tend to leave on braking distance. :-/

Stephen
__________________
================================================== ======================
FixedWing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 03:22 PM   #7
ryans4
Senior Member
Account #: 4359
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,314
Default the end with the DS2500 will have more bias then the Axis. Same pad F/R, no bias change...

__________________
ryans4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Discussion Forums:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community

Contact Us - AudiWorld - Archive - Top