Poll: MAF g/s peak for the stage II or II+ crowd. Mine is 232 @ 6k+RPM

üBER.QIK · 10-19-2005, 11:41 AM

I've been looking at g/s rates in various threads/discussions - which usually involve the Stage 3 crowd.

If you're a 2,2+ ... what's your peak g/s using VAG?

üBER.QIK · 10-19-2005, 11:48 AM

Yikes... I figgered I was low (hence the poll). Any thoughts on what my probem might be? My FATS time knda sucks at 6.1 sec. I've checked the usual stuff ... no boost leaks, cleaned MAF, clean filter, no CELs etc. obtw... I'm at 3k ft. elevation.

ST'S4 · 10-19-2005, 11:53 AM

[badmoon] · 10-19-2005, 11:54 AM

I was running 4.3-4.4 FATS at stage 2+ which consisted of X, piggie pipes to my milltek single, RS4 ic's, phenolic spacers, and darintake mod to the airbox...but that was pretty much it.

PSmalls::DoggieStyle · 10-19-2005, 11:57 AM

AudiS4Guy's car (block 003) with AMS software IIRC:

SLPRS4's car with APR Race software:

Piggie and I, both running X chip stage 2+ setups:

As you can see, most cars are in the 255-270 range when near/at sea level. Unless you are well above sea level, I think you're reading are quite a bit lower than they should be. You may have a bad MAF sensor, or other problem, causing the low readings.

PSmalls::DoggieStyle · 10-19-2005, 11:59 AM

PSmalls::DoggieStyle · 10-19-2005, 12:00 PM

In more average temps, those low of FATS times and that high of airflow readings are unheard of for that level of modification.

Captain Matt, I be · 10-19-2005, 12:01 PM

BiturboBoy_V2.0_S3-- · 10-19-2005, 12:03 PM

[badmoon] · 10-19-2005, 12:03 PM

MikeyB09 runs 4.2 FATS at Stage 2 on 92...some cars are just fast...I don't know what to tell you.

10-19-2005, 11:41 AM	#1
üBER.QIK Junior Member Account #: 41342 Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 812	Poll: MAF g/s peak for the stage II or II+ crowd. Mine is 232 @ 6k+RPM I've been looking at g/s rates in various threads/discussions - which usually involve the Stage 3 crowd. If you're a 2,2+ ... what's your peak g/s using VAG? __________________ Recent upgrades: K04s, RS4 Clutch, RS4 Engine Mounts, GIAC 3- ECU, Hitachi MAF, Vast Snub üBER.QIK Launch>

10-19-2005, 11:48 AM	#2
üBER.QIK Junior Member Account #: 41342 Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 812	Re: I think my peak was 297g/s at stage 2+ Yikes... I figgered I was low (hence the poll). Any thoughts on what my probem might be? My FATS time knda sucks at 6.1 sec. I've checked the usual stuff ... no boost leaks, cleaned MAF, clean filter, no CELs etc. obtw... I'm at 3k ft. elevation. __________________ Recent upgrades: K04s, RS4 Clutch, RS4 Engine Mounts, GIAC 3- ECU, Hitachi MAF, Vast Snub üBER.QIK Launch>

10-19-2005, 11:53 AM	#3
ST'S4 New Member Account #: 70073 Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 448	that's not right at all...you should be at least in the 270's minimum __________________ Bored 2.8/9.1CR/ASP Fueling JE Pistons/034 Rods/2.4 or RS4 Heads Complete OEM RS4 Intake/Vast Meth Inject KO4's Clearenced/Port Polished X-1 Intake/ER IC's/55w Ecodes ASP Exhaust Heads to Tips Clutchmaster Stage IV with LWFW STaSIS Ohlins 700/800 AWE DTS Alcons 355 6 Piston BBK Built and cared by WMS and KeKe <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/US/TX/Austin.html?bannertypeclick=big2"> </a>

10-19-2005, 11:54 AM	#4
[badmoon] Senior Member Account #: 43125 Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 6,021	your ecodes probably... I was running 4.3-4.4 FATS at stage 2+ which consisted of X, piggie pipes to my milltek single, RS4 ic's, phenolic spacers, and darintake mod to the airbox...but that was pretty much it.

10-19-2005, 11:57 AM	#5
PSmalls::DoggieStyle Elder Member Account #: 69223 Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 30,285	I've got a few graphs.... AudiS4Guy's car (block 003) with AMS software IIRC: SLPRS4's car with APR Race software: Piggie and I, both running X chip stage 2+ setups: As you can see, most cars are in the 255-270 range when near/at sea level. Unless you are well above sea level, I think you're reading are quite a bit lower than they should be. You may have a bad MAF sensor, or other problem, causing the low readings.

10-19-2005, 11:59 AM	#6
PSmalls::DoggieStyle Elder Member Account #: 69223 Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 30,285	Some cars at/near sea level don't even get those high of readings, let alone at 3k' elevation.

10-19-2005, 12:00 PM	#7
PSmalls::DoggieStyle Elder Member Account #: 69223 Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 30,285	I may be wrong, but seems like everything you're talking about took place in COLD temps. In more average temps, those low of FATS times and that high of airflow readings are unheard of for that level of modification.

10-19-2005, 12:01 PM	#8
Captain Matt, I be Elder Member Account #: 26545 Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 32,092	my II+ MAF readings from a while back - 70deg ambient __________________ Support Innovation for the B5 Platform - www.autospeedperformance.com www.vastperformance.com B5 S4 Forum Cliff's Notes B5 S4 RNS-E Nav+ Installation

10-19-2005, 12:03 PM	#9
BiturboBoy_V2.0_S3-- Elder Member Account #: 13456 Join Date: Dec 2000 Posts: 12,499	thats low. i was in the 260's at stage 1. __________________ AWESOME post, funny and informative for newbs...its not all right but i suggest you click!

10-19-2005, 12:03 PM	#10
[badmoon] Senior Member Account #: 43125 Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 6,021	Done in 40 degrees MikeyB09 runs 4.2 FATS at Stage 2 on 92...some cars are just fast...I don't know what to tell you.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode


Discussion Forums:	Advanced Search