|
Sign in using an external account
|
|
|||||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
The temp outside was ~65F and I had very little gas. No additional tweaks, same strech of road as always.
I was under the impression I could hit 130 MPH by taking 4th gear to redline after seeing Mark P's RPM vs speed ECUx logs. I took it all the way until I hit the limiter, then let off. Apparently, ECUx only logged me up to 7027.75 RPM, which transaltes to 126.6821 MPH according to ECUx. This took a whopping 10.846 seconds, so I assume the full 60-130 would take just ~11 seconds. Here is a graph for those visual people.... ![]() Along with pulling a ~11 second 60-130 time, I also pulled a 3.66 FATS and 4.97 FATS+. Both of those times are by far my best, woo hoo! And more graphs for those visual people.... MAF and Timing: ![]() Correction Factors: ![]() 02 Voltages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
AudiWorld Super User
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,096
|
Very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 587
|
you are about as fast as non x50 996tt or a 360CS .
still think you are a sensitive guy when it comes to my comments.........P |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
I believe my 02 voltages were affected by airflow. They seem to dip at peak MAF and then come back up as airflow drops a touch. At this point, it's no big deal....but what about in cooler weather when I'm flowing closer to 300 g/s!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
I will attempt to run 60-130 MPH test on our non X50 996TT on exact same stretch of road to see how the 2 cars compare.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
AudiWorld Super User
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,096
|
If worse comes to worse you'll just have to turn the MBC back a quarter turn or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
You, on the other hand, need a bigger MAF. Get on that ASAP, big boi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
AudiWorld Super User
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,096
|
Over 310g/s lately :/ Man, 88mm just isn't enough flow for me. Who'da thunk?
Hey Jacob, Can I trade my bling-bling 88 for a non bling-bling 90? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Elder Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Garage is empty, add now
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
|
I trapped at 125 crossing the traps at an indicated 6600-6700. This is consistent with Mark P's RPM calculator. But the trap speed is an average over the last 66 feet at the dragstrip, so that could skew things.
Are you on the stock 225/45/17 tires? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 00c, 040, 047, 130mph, 2g2, 60mph, 60mph130mph, bosch, f, f00c, f00c2g2, maf, results, sensor |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community









</a>

Linear Mode
