Go Back   AudiWorld Forums » Audi Models » Audi S4 / RS4 » S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Notices

Discussion Forums:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-18-2005, 06:46 PM   #1
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default Played around tweaking an AMS stage 5 car this weekend. (extremely long)

BuffaloNogaro spent the weekend here in MI. We spent a lot of time tweaking and logging his setup in an attempt to optimize his setup. On Saturday afternoon, Nick Gustas and his girlfriend joined Joe and me. Otherwise, it was just the 2 of us.

Before tweaking anything, we took some baseline logs to see what exactly we were working with....

02 voltages with no tweaks:


Timing retard with no tweaks:


I only logged 1 or 2 blocks at once so neither of the graphs above include RPM. Both of these are from WOT in 2nd or 3rd gear (I can't remember which were done under what condition, but a majority of them were done in 2nd).

We didn't get a good baseline FATS test block 003 done because of traffic, and it wasn't done until much later in the day, but based on my calculations he was pulling about 550 RPM/Sec with no tweaks at all.

**Note that all FATS test were done later on in the afternoon with only Joe and I in the car. The temperature was very similar, maybe dropping 15 degrees at most. It was between 60 and 75 degrees all afternoon**

Of course, I lost this log among the dozens we did. As far as I can remember, he was pulling slightly under 320 g/s at ~6k rpm, which is where we had to shutdown due to traffic. His timing was abysmal to say the least, with noticeable pull back all over the place and maybe only 1 data point in double digits.

Before tweaking, we also checked his LTFTs; they were all positive #s between 3% and 7%. That along with his low 02 voltages at WOT (in 1 of the graphs above) made me decide to start by adding some fuel....

02 voltages with 10% primary fuel added:


As you can see, not much changed at WOT. However, his LTFTs adjusted to slightly negative #s. The lack of adjustment at WOT stumped us. We then decided to add even more fuel in an attempt to document WOT 02 voltage changes....

02 voltages with 15% primary fuel added:


The first thing I noticed here was that the midrange seemed to fatten up a bit, yet the top end still tapered down pretty low.

After a quick discussion, we decided on pulling a touch of the primary we had just added because it didn't seem to be making a noticeable differece at WOT, yet the LTFTs were quite a bit negative at this point. We pulled ~2.5% back from the 15% added on the last run....

02 voltages with 12.5% primary added:


Because we wanted to richen it up at WOT still, we added some secondary on the next run....

02 voltages with 12.5% primary and 120% secondary fuel added:


As you can see, the WOT 02 voltages didn't adjust much from these changes. We decided to return everything back to default and play a nice practical joke on Joe. Nick and I told him we were putting in some really nice changes and he should cycle the key (lemmitweaks don't take effect until you cycle the key on and off, which you can do while at speed if you have "madd skillz y0") when we say we're ready. Little did he know, all we were doing was reducing SEL to 62%. The look on his face was priceless as he thought we just broke his car. We apologized and told him we were setting everything back to default. Instead, we reduced SEL even more to ~56%. We were laughing our butts off as he tried passing someone on the freeway, but we managed to get a boost log....

Boost log with SEL scaling set at ~56%:


Afterwards, we returned everything to default, and dropped Nick and his girl off so they could go on their way.

The rest of the logs were done wtihout Nick so we decided it was time to do FATS testing, etc.

The first thing we did was the baseline FATS test as I described above. As I already stated above, it was cut short due to traffic and averaged ~550 RPM/Sec.

Next, I added 12% of primary fuel. I thought that was a nice compromise between the fueling settings we had tried so far. After letting things cool for a bit by crusing on the highway, we did another FATS test....

FATS test with 12% primary fuel added:


The car seemd a bit faster than the baseline run. The rpm/sec increased by 30, confirming this observation. We were now seeing 580 RPM/Sec.

I still felt like we need more fuel at WOT so the next FATS test was done with 120% secondary fuel added in addition to the 12% primary fuel added on the previous run....

FATS test with 12% primary and 120% secondary fuel added:


Based on the raw data, it seems as though Joe's car went from the 580RPM/Sec on his previous run to 577RPM/Sec with the added primary and secondary fuel via Lemmiwinks. We didn't calculate this until after the fact, but Joe had commented it felt slower. I think it was all in his head since it is almost impossible to feel such a slight difference, but nonetheless he seems to be correct.

Because Joe preferred the 12% primary added with no secondary tweaks, we compromised and did a log of timing retard with 12.5% primary....

Timing retard with 12.5% primary fuel added:


I then checked his LTFTs and found his part throttle trims to be between -8% and -10%. Apparently, we had added too much fuel in an attempt to richen things up at WOT. I then adjusted the lemmitweaks to only 8% primary fuel added and we did several different logs with this setting....

02 voltages with 8% primary fuel added:


We still weren't happy with the WOT 02 voltages near redline, but the LTFTs settled down to -5% or so and the midrange at WOT was also in the mid .8s which seemed pretty good. Because we wanted to only adjust WOT as the LTFTs seemed just right, we started adding secondary and documenting the results....

02 voltages with 8% primary and 140% secondary fueling added:


02 voltages with 8% primary and 150% secondary fueling added:


Neither of the logs with secondary added seemed to improve the WOT 02 voltages. We were pretty happy with the 02 voltages when 8% primary was added and no secondary was tweaked, so we left his car like that.

Timing retard with 8% primary and 150% secondary fueling added:


It doesn't seem like the extra fuel had much of an impact on the timing retard.

I was quite disappointed with the combination of overall timing and timing correction on this car, but I imagine that is related to the mystery WOT fueling issues. My gut says it is a fuel filter or fuel pump issue, but I'd love to see some other logs from healthy AMS Stage 5 cars.

Joe is now on his way to Portland, Oregon for a rally. He is a crew member for one of the teams and he has the "great responsibility" of driving the rally truck there :P. Therefore, he left his slowgaro at my house for the week :-o

PS-I probably left bits and pieces out. It's hard to remember everything as you can see we spent quite a bit of timing doing this all. All comments and questions are welcome. I'm hoping this will thread will jumpstart a good tweaking discussion. In addition, I'd really like to help Joe resolve this fueling issue, assuming it's not normal to have such low 02 voltages at WOT.
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:03 PM   #2
bagodoosh
AudiWorld Senior Member
Account #: 81015
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,165
Default amazing..

you didn't mention once about your ECUx not working.

are you trying to conclude something AMS related or just general tweaking related?
__________________
bagodoosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:04 PM   #3
Woland
Member
Account #: 39771
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,957
Default i thought secondary dealt with idle fuel only...

did you try anything with the multiplicative (inc/dec loads) trims?
__________________

Woland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:07 PM   #4
JBear::FATS
Senior Member
Account #: 9725
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,427
Default I *MAY* have some old logs .. Just not sure how extensive I logged before giving up

on the AMS Stage V. I do remember that my PT LTFT's were around 0-+2 range. I'm not suprised by your 02 voltages, AMS tuning seems to be a bit leaner than GIAC, I think max power (on 91 anyway) is going to be in the .88 range.

No buildup on the exhaust tips with AMS
__________________
________________________________________

2001 S4 6-Speed Santorin

Engine/Drivetrain: ASP Custom Tuned Stage III Fueling, RS4 Y-Pipe/Clutch/Fuel Pump/IC's, X1 Intake, Samco F-Hose, APR Bi-Pipe, Piggie Pipes, Miltek Single, AWE DTS, APR Snub, TG SS, VAST Water/Meth Kit.

Suspension/Brakes: Vogtland GT, Neuspeed Rear Swaybar (Med), Stoptech 332 BBK.

Exterior: 18" BBS CH, M3 Lip Spoiler, SPP Foglight Bulbs, RS4 Grill, E-Codes.

Interior: UUC Alcantata Boot, TwinData
EFU, Strat S4 Logo Floor Mats, HW V1, PhatBox.
JBear::FATS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:09 PM   #5
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default Hah, I actually spent a few hours trying to get ECUx to work with Mike2kS4 today.

He sat in my car, tried everything he could think of, no luck at all. Erin Watwood at APR has been great to me though and will not give up.

I'm trying to give people some insight into what tweaks should be done based on certain observations so they can use similar logic themselves. I also would like some help diagnosing this car since I firmly believe something is wrong. I would say AMS just won't accept the tweaks, but the tweaks altered everything except at WOT where 02 voltages tapered like there was a lack of fuel.
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:09 PM   #6
B5QShip
AudiWorld Super User
Account #: 78120
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,743
Default Did you log injector duty cycle?

Just a No0b observation, but I agree it seems like it could be a fuel filter/pump issue or injectors maxin' out --> though I assume the Stg5 kit *should* have more than enough fueling headroom.
__________________
B5QShip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:11 PM   #7
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default I've always heard it is for adjusting and fine tuning WOT trims.

Mike Moore has had very good success fine tuning WOT trims with secondary fueling, actually.

I did not play with channels 2 and 3. I wish I had a lot more time to do it. I'm flat out a logging whore!
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:11 PM   #8
(R)S4 SmokedU /-///
Member
Account #: 79946
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,725
Default Wow, my brain hurts now! And I thought his car was ok now......guess not :-/

__________________


2001 VAST Performance Stg3 WB
Visit Vast Performance!!
______________________________________

Post of the year: http://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/2765684.phtml
______________________________________

"Owning an IS 300 is like having a pet goldfish. Owning a used/higher mileage S4 is like having a pet monkey. Whole different world" <S4_Cinci>

"duhhh its galvanic corrosion, you take too dissimilar metals with different electronegativities and add salt ... it becomes a battery." <DxC> Bitchin' about the Stoptechs + road salt!

"I wish I would have been in my S4 and got hit. I would love to have totaled that bitch." <2KS4 AWE :: Jason> after totaling his rental car!

"Four doors, four hundred horses, four wheel drive, four season car... 'nuf said" <LI-S4> on his sentiment regarding the B5 S4 vs. the E46 M3

"um...who cares. I want the last twenty second of my life back..." <LI-S4> in response to a lame post that he read.

"Why did I click on that... Is there a way to undo a click??" <LI-S4>

"The S4 needs a soft touch like a sophisticated older woman. The Detroit iron likes to be spanked hard like a young sl*t!" <S4_Cinci>

"they are neglecting the thumb for up front, as used in the "shocker +"" <s4gobabygolovesbeer>

"I personally wouldn't believe a word he says if his tongue came notarized."
<matts4quattro> referring to Snowtrooper

"Marc, you know i still give you mad respect for your runs. but c'mon. put your carpet back in or something... LOL" <a4s4quattro> aka Snowtrooper
(R)S4 SmokedU  /-/// is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:12 PM   #9
JBear::FATS
Senior Member
Account #: 9725
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,427
Default I would like to get clarification on this, based on the various resources

I've looked over, it does say this. I know on this forum, secondary is usually recommended to add additional fuel at WOT.
__________________
________________________________________

2001 S4 6-Speed Santorin

Engine/Drivetrain: ASP Custom Tuned Stage III Fueling, RS4 Y-Pipe/Clutch/Fuel Pump/IC's, X1 Intake, Samco F-Hose, APR Bi-Pipe, Piggie Pipes, Miltek Single, AWE DTS, APR Snub, TG SS, VAST Water/Meth Kit.

Suspension/Brakes: Vogtland GT, Neuspeed Rear Swaybar (Med), Stoptech 332 BBK.

Exterior: 18" BBS CH, M3 Lip Spoiler, SPP Foglight Bulbs, RS4 Grill, E-Codes.

Interior: UUC Alcantata Boot, TwinData
EFU, Strat S4 Logo Floor Mats, HW V1, PhatBox.
JBear::FATS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 07:12 PM   #10
PSmalls::DoggieStyle
Elder Member
Account #: 69223
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30,285
Default Yeah, I understand leaner than GIAC. Tapering near redline worries me, though.

And I can't imagine a software tweaked for 91 octane would be in the low .8s and dipping into the. 7s near redline @ WOT. No wonder it has crappy timing!?!?!?
PSmalls::DoggieStyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ams, s4, stage



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Discussion Forums:


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 AudiWorld.com Audi Enthusiast Community

Contact Us - AudiWorld - Archive - Top