S6 (C7 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C7 Audi S6 produced from 2012 - 2017

Bye bye S6 hello 911s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2014, 11:10 PM
  #11  
AudiWorld Member
 
johnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boost Addiction
It's too late now, but I think I would have fought AOA on this. The mods you made have to have a link to the failure. For example, if you had a tune and the windshield wiper failed, that should still be under warranty because, obviously, the tune had nothing to do with it.

It's just as clear to me that a tune almost certainly couldn't have caused o-rings to leak.
I have to disagree. The car has an APR tune. Why is it becoming so common in the U.S. to blame someone else and not take responsibility for your own actions. "Almost certainly"? This is why Audi is doing TD1's. Back in the day, owners were bringing in their modded B5 twin turbo S4's and wanting them fixed under warranty. Pay to play. I don't understand how someone can complain about Audi not covering this under warranty when the ECU has been modded. It wasn't a wiper failure.
Old 07-12-2014, 05:17 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Member
 
thelionsden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnz
I have to disagree. The car has an APR tune. Why is it becoming so common in the U.S. to blame someone else and not take responsibility for your own actions. "Almost certainly"? This is why Audi is doing TD1's. Back in the day, owners were bringing in their modded B5 twin turbo S4's and wanting them fixed under warranty. Pay to play. I don't understand how someone can complain about Audi not covering this under warranty when the ECU has been modded. It wasn't a wiper failure.
I agree with you to a point. Fairly, they should not have to warranty something that has been stressed beyond its anticipated stock load requirement.

Before I decided that his issue is a legitimate rejection in coverage, I would want to know if the tune increases the stress/pressure on the specific o ring in question.

Granted, fighting it could be a tough row to hoe even with Magnusson/Moss. Engineers could be required as expert witnesses to demonstrate the actual functions and stresses that are increased by tuning the car.

But in fairness to the vehicle owner too, I am sure there are many non-engineers that make these warranty decisions that wrongly reject warranty claims due to their lack of knowledge of the true specifics.

Just changing an unrelated thing on the car should not void claims offhand unless it truly has created the problem.
Old 07-12-2014, 07:07 AM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
mwar99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It was not the tune that caused the leak. My car and several others without a tune have had the same leak. My opinion is that the dealership wants to make more money without a warranty claim.
Old 07-12-2014, 07:34 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
 
thelionsden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And then again, there are many untuned cars that have not had the problem at all. You don't really know if the tune caused it on your car or not. maybe it would not have happened if you weren't tuned.

Even tho it was caused by something unknown on untuned cars, perhaps defective parts or design, the question is, does the tune increase the pressure on that point to a place where it could reasonably be considered the likely, or even possible, cause in your specific case?

If the tune does not change the stress that the part/system endures, then you should be grouped in with the untuned cars that for some reason had the problem occur and have your claim allowed.

I am just talking about in an ideal world where these facts could be know without question. There is too much uncertainty as to the truth, making the resolution much more difficult, and the non-engineer mouth breathing warranty adjustor has decided to err on the side of the company, armed with the evidence of a "tune".

Imagine that! :-)

Last edited by thelionsden; 07-12-2014 at 09:56 AM.
Old 07-12-2014, 10:53 AM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
 
mwar99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have a feeling you are going to see a lot of the early delivery S6/7's have the leak issue. They may have subsequently fixed it. Just a hunch, no hard facts to back it up.
Old 07-12-2014, 12:38 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Vijay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,776
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnz
I have to disagree. The car has an APR tune. Why is it becoming so common in the U.S. to blame someone else and not take responsibility for your own actions. "Almost certainly"? This is why Audi is doing TD1's. Back in the day, owners were bringing in their modded B5 twin turbo S4's and wanting them fixed under warranty. Pay to play. I don't understand how someone can complain about Audi not covering this under warranty when the ECU has been modded. It wasn't a wiper failure.
If there is a problem unique to tuned cars, then absolutely, one should take responsibility. However, if a particular problem is happening to stock vehicles, where is the proof or even the likelihood that the tune caused the issue?
Old 07-12-2014, 02:30 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
 
Boost Addiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NoVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the pressure hoses were popping off, then it would be easy to believe that a tune was a factor- maybe even the cause.

But if the leaks were coolant or oil-related, it's hard for me to understand how any tune could cause that, or have any contributory effect.

I completely agree with the other poster that people should take responsibility for their actions. It just seems to me that this is a clear case of the tune having no possible-- as far as I can see-- role in the failure the OP described.

BTW, I had a B5 S4 for 14 years, and had an APR tune for most of that time. Never had an engine-related problem, though I understood that if the turbos blew, or a headgasket started to leak, I'd be entirely on my own re the factory warranty.
Old 07-21-2014, 09:24 AM
  #18  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
txgriz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isn't the question readily answered by studying the statistics? Assuming there are enough tuned vehicles to generate a statistically valid sample size, the probability of failure of tune and non-tuned vehicles can be compared. If the probability of failure is the same for both sets, it can be concluded that the failure is not correlated with the tune. There should be no need for expert witness testimony. Just discovery on their failure stats.
Old 07-28-2014, 03:04 PM
  #19  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
ellisinA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnz
I have to disagree. The car has an APR tune. Why is it becoming so common in the U.S. to blame someone else and not take responsibility for your own actions. "Almost certainly"? This is why Audi is doing TD1's. Back in the day, owners were bringing in their modded B5 twin turbo S4's and wanting them fixed under warranty. Pay to play. I don't understand how someone can complain about Audi not covering this under warranty when the ECU has been modded. It wasn't a wiper failure.
Those turbos were defective from the factory. Oil inlets where too small = not enough oil supply.
Old 07-28-2014, 03:07 PM
  #20  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
ellisinA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vijay
If there is a problem unique to tuned cars, then absolutely, one should take responsibility. However, if a particular problem is happening to stock vehicles, where is the proof or even the likelihood that the tune caused the issue?
See my post on Audizine:

http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php/607942-Hesitation-between-1000-and-3000-rpm-amp-coolant-pipe-leak…
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GiulianoBrazil
A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion
17
03-12-2011 07:45 AM
Sox6
A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion
27
02-08-2010 06:39 PM
SteveKen
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
28
07-16-2008 09:30 AM
ickyrex
RS 6 Discussion (C5)
5
12-29-2007 02:25 PM
Jason Teller
Audi News Forum
0
06-20-2006 06:29 AM



Quick Reply: Bye bye S6 hello 911s



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 AM.