S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion Discussion forum for the B6 Audi S4 produced from 2003-2005 And B7 Audi S4 produced from 2005 -2008

Weight Distribution 62/38

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2003, 09:01 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
343Bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Weight Distribution 62/38

<center><img src="http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~amaist/s4vsm3p4.jpg"></center><p>Didn't someone say it was 50/50?
Old 07-17-2003, 09:03 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Expert
 
Sia Bani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 31,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty bad review of the new s4.
Old 07-17-2003, 09:26 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Ron O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Boy I would love to have an abstract of the article. If

any of our German speaking colleagues could do a translation I sure would appreciate it.
Thanks ... Ron
Old 07-17-2003, 09:46 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Expert
 
Sia Bani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 31,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't speak it, but the numbers do.
Old 07-17-2003, 09:48 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Kurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I know enough basic German to see that

the braking from 60kmh was 12 feet worse for the S4 than the M3...that's the difference from a gentle nudge to obliteration.
Old 07-17-2003, 09:59 AM
  #6  
LCP
AudiWorld Expert
 
LCP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 26,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default MT spewed that near 50/50 crapola...

...which would only be achieved if the front half of the car was made of aluminum, the front half of the car's body panels were carbon fiber, and all of the underhood accessories were moved to the trunk.
Old 07-17-2003, 10:03 AM
  #7  
gk1
AudiWorld Super User
 
gk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NJ->CO
Posts: 8,706
Received 517 Likes on 452 Posts
Default It was from 100kmh...close to 62mph.

And was closer to 14 ft. worse. Probably due to the S4's extra 335lbs.
Old 07-17-2003, 10:06 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
3707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Summary of text in article

The S4 reacts quicker on the gas from 1500rpm,
and accelerates faster in most gears. With the
exception of a standing start and unless the M3 engine is in its sweet spot in the right gear.
The M3 needs to be revved to get the most out
of it. The S4 has more torque, is more dynamic
but does like to rev to the redline.

The M3 has a slight oversteer and feels more
like a sports car due to the lesser weight and the 19" wheels.

Both have excellent gear boxes. The brakes on
the S4 tend to fade when hot.

Basically in top performance the M3 has the
edge, the S4 has the throaty V8 sound as
a bonus. The testers expected more from the S4.

-------------------
Personal comment:
-------------------
Sounds like the S4 Avant is worth its price, but
the M3 beats the S4 Sedan?
Old 07-17-2003, 10:13 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Member
 
3707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Translation of Hockenheim inset

At Hockenheim it is very clear that the S4 has
a "sport" problem.

The front heavy weight distribution causes
heavy understeer at the limit.

This costs time and cannot be compensated by the
extra traction coming out of the corners.

The comfortable suspension/ride causes more body
roll compared to the M3.

The car from Munchen feels like a fish in the
water at Hochenheim.

With clockwork precision, the M3 goes around the
track, similar to a German touring car, which
is what the M3 really is, plus it offers the
basics of a street car.
Old 07-17-2003, 10:16 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Ron O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks


Quick Reply: Weight Distribution 62/38



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 PM.