S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

been playing around with the car, adding timing. Whats a safe level for correction factor?

Old 09-02-2006, 10:57 PM
  #41  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike2kS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Calling it a "Map" is a misnomer...

I'm no expert but I've learned quite a bit at ASP as well as through my own explorations.

There are quite a few factors which go into timing correction. There are a number look-up tables used to determine the requested values. There are also triggers which affect timing in the long-term(CF) Medium term (IAT) and short term (KV). When the ECU detects spurious (not predicted) knock, it applies a set amount of correction over a specified time... say, it pulls 5deg and waits 2/10ths of a second and listens again, if there is still knock it pulls again, usually an amount much higher than the first... 12deg. And it can do so again in another .2sec... I've seen negative timing (retard) during my homebrew times. Anyhow, once the knock has quelled it waits and ups timing at a rate of about half the amount it took away per step. This process is totally separate from CF and serves as another safeguard.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:04 PM
  #42  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Farb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sold the 7?
Old 09-02-2006, 11:06 PM
  #43  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike2kS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yep...

Too many projects... work and car-wise. I'm feeding two S4's for the time being, lol.

I'll get another when I get a larger house (and larger garage) in a couple years, no biggie.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:09 PM
  #44  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default So you're saying this is independent of long term correction factors...interesting, thank you.

It somewhat reminds me of how Nye explained that LTFT and STFTs work together. If STFTs hit the limit in a certain direction, LTFT will bump up in the same direction. The process continues until STFTs are within the +/-25% limit. At least this is how I remember him explaining it...
Old 09-02-2006, 11:17 PM
  #45  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike2kS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Indeed...

You're right. If you have consistent high KV activity, it'll bump your CF's in a similar way. The knock sensor circuits are also pretty smart. They know what signal pattern matches up with destructive knock and requires immediate attention (combination of cylinder and frequency/amplitude)and one that indicates insufficient octane (all cylinders and freq/amplitude). The second type results in a more rapid application of CF. KV's are just a shadow of the info the ECU gets from the knock sensors.

All of those variables are adjustable too. If you look at many chips, like X, you'll see the timing recovers on a 1:1 scale with the pull. Stock timing logic, like I'm running now, is much slower to recover. But since we're confident it's safe, that's gonna change bigtime
Old 09-02-2006, 11:21 PM
  #46  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thanks for sharing 2 key points, differentiation of knock (CF effect) and manipulating variables.

I never would have thought you could manipulate the recovery time.

It's at times like these where I realize I just don't know anything.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:30 PM
  #47  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike2kS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Glad to help out... Good questions spawn useful answers :)

Honestly, it's really daunting what can be accomplished with these ECU's. There are so many ways to get the same desired effect, but like anything else in life, the most effective way is usually the most difficult.

If you have any other questions maybe I can provide an answer or two.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:33 PM
  #48  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default For now, I'll let this info marinate in my melon. You've been quite a help, kind sir.

Once all of this sinks in, I'm sure more questions will arise. The person you really need to answer questions for is Nye...throw that man a bone.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:35 PM
  #49  
AudiWorld Expert
 
nyet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default and a 3rd key point, which myself and diego have long suspected

that logged absolute kv values are almost meaningless, the ECU does much more to distinguish between engine noise, normal ignition, pre-ignition, and detonation!

mike, thanks for confirming this.
Old 09-02-2006, 11:36 PM
  #50  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Ah10@WMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hehe i always knew if we need to squeeze valueable data from knowledgeable individuals

we need to ask the right question!

It has been so much fun asking you the right question, i have learnt alot from the past couple of months. CJK's car is a very good example!

thank you sir!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: been playing around with the car, adding timing. Whats a safe level for correction factor?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM.