AudiWorld Forums: Wow. 6.1 for a stock car?! You sure you were not on a grade of any sort?

2008: Audi Year in Review

Long Term Garage: 2009 A5 3.2 quattro S-line

Bound for Detroit: Audi R8 V10 Breaks Cover

B6 S4 Forum || B7 S4 Forum || B7 RS 4 Forum

[Thread] [Post Followup] [Post Picture] [Search Forums] [S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion]

Wow. 6.1 for a stock car?! You sure you were not on a grade of any sort?

Posted by: tusca on 2005-06-01 09:53:20
Account #: 87522

In Reply to: Sure you don't have me confused with someone else? I don't remember helpying you via e-mail. posted by DocSlow (Mini P!g) on 2005-06-01 09:39:53

Stock FATS, M-box: 6.1 (plus lots of graphs!) - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 09:36:39 (876 views)

I LOVE THIS CAR! ( Part II ) Stock S4 - FATS = 6.52 - EdyJun 2005-11-30 19:41:43 (145 views)

Nice post, Chris. - RedWing 2005-06-01 19:20:24 (130 views)

that car is not stock. - BlackS4TT (Josh) 2005-06-01 13:46:53 (131 views)

/me shrugs. I only know what the logs tell me. - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 15:04:55 (125 views)

where did the car come from? i'd be interested in what lemmi says. experts: what should we look at? - Oo.et.oO 2005-06-02 06:32:49 (120 views)

:o) - glad to see it's getting use - Mark P 2005-06-01 11:35:20 (129 views)

Great time! And I thought my 7.02s was fast... - 50valves 2005-06-01 11:26:51 (145 views)

Nice data - great running stock car. - DarinS4Turbo 2005-06-01 10:14:47 (130 views)

Nice lookin' timing! - B5QShip 2005-06-01 10:07:22 (134 views)

dang! that's fast! i gotta compare with Mark's calculator and Nye's. mine is at ~7.7s - Oo.et.oO 2005-06-01 09:59:47 (174 views)

7.7 is not abnormally slow, sir - nyet 2005-06-01 13:52:31 (149 views)

right, but it was about 45 degrees and no altitude with moderate humidity and about 970mbar ambient - Oo.et.oO 2005-06-02 06:31:35 (130 views)

that car is an abberration - nyet 2005-06-01 13:08:36 (157 views)

Yeah, I was really surprised when I first calculated the results. :o - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 10:05:31 (166 views)

Someone posted tweaks to a stock chip about a week ago that resulted in significant HP/T gains. - tusca 2005-06-01 10:13:39 (168 views)

oh yeah. we should both check with lemmi to see if there were tweaks. doubt it with mine. - Oo.et.oO 2005-06-01 10:35:28 (129 views)

as it turns out, my runs were on what is probably 92 even though it was labeled 93. frickin VT - Oo.et.oO 2005-06-01 10:07:56 (127 views)

Sure you don't have me confused with someone else? I don't remember helpying you via e-mail. - DocSlow (Mini P!g) 2005-06-01 09:39:53 (168 views)

Wow. 6.1 for a stock car?! You sure you were not on a grade of any sort? - tusca 2005-06-01 09:53:20 (141 views)

not on a grade, i have his .csvs - nyet 2005-06-01 13:51:15 (157 views)

Shouldn't stock do 0-60 in 5.8 sec? - nadrealista 2005-06-01 12:58:42 (142 views)

FATS is not a 0-60 time. STFA using "FATS" as a keyword. - tusca 2005-06-01 13:03:49 (164 views)

4200* - DocSlow (Mini P!g) 2005-06-01 13:04:28 (129 views)

Yes. I collected FATS times from 8 different points over the course of 3 weeks. - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 09:58:42 (161 views)

I'm sure it was you. - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 09:48:47 (137 views)

Doh, you are right. Just checked my PEB e-mails. You're very welcome. - DocSlow (Mini P!g) 2005-06-01 09:50:01 (146 views)

So then...thanks. :-p - Pie4Foo 2005-06-01 10:17:59 (130 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

Login with existing account
Create a new account

Terms of Use | Copyright © 1996-2008 by AudiWorld. All rights reserved.