stock airbox vs. stock/hole vs. darintake vs. darintake with chip airflow...
03-24-2003, 05:59 PM
#1
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stock airbox vs. stock/hole vs. darintake vs. darintake with chip airflow...
<center><img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/51238/airflow_comparison.jpg"></center><p>Ok, I think I have exhausted the usefull permutations of the airbox configurations. Except maybe with a screen over the airbox hole...
All runs done in same relative humidity, 60 deg F, same stretch of road, etc... On my car the AWE S-flo (with the new ITG larger filter alla Darintake) gives about 10 g/s over the stock filter. No 25 g/s, but not bad either.
All runs done in same relative humidity, 60 deg F, same stretch of road, etc... On my car the AWE S-flo (with the new ITG larger filter alla Darintake) gives about 10 g/s over the stock filter. No 25 g/s, but not bad either.
03-24-2003, 06:27 PM
#6
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the 6400 rpm #'s
I can tell you that at 6400 rpm:
stock box/filter 210 g/s
stock filter/hole 220 g/s
darintake 230 g/s
darintake/chip 264 g/s
I hope this helps...
stock box/filter 210 g/s
stock filter/hole 220 g/s
darintake 230 g/s
darintake/chip 264 g/s
I hope this helps...
Trending Topics
03-24-2003, 07:48 PM
#10
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks good - did you happen to check barometric pressure on the diff days?
I've found g/sec will vary by as much as 10 g/sec on a low pressure day vs. high pressure, same temperature. Your stock gains look a tad optimistic, more than I would have expected anyway!