Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

SQ5 to premier at Detroit Auto Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2013, 04:05 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
JaXeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes, it's official!!

I was ready to purchase a 2013 3.0T until I caught wind of the petrol TFSI SQ5 coming in June of last year:

https://www.audiworld.com/forums/sho...1&postcount=15


This *WILL* be my next car. :-D

*edit*... I'm delightfully pleased that I was wrong about the HP numbers. :-)

Last edited by JaXeN; 01-08-2013 at 04:09 AM.
Old 01-08-2013, 06:21 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Member
 
kip1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 3.0T is a fast machine, I have driven cars with both 3.0T and S with 3.0T and I really didnt notice a lot of difference. Id test drive them sequentially and then make up my mind.
Old 01-08-2013, 06:41 AM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
dsackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like a great car and I am drooling. Astounded the amount of power they are getting from the 3.0l motor and that there is really nothing from BMW or Mercedes, or anyone else (except the new baby Cayenne) for that matter, that competes.

However my practical side asks whether I will ever use all that S stuff in every day driving. There are diminishing returns the higher up you go and the regular 3.0T is plenty. For $60,000 odd I will rather get a dedicated sportster to get the cob-webs out weekends.

Looks like I will be saving $20,000 by taking delivery of a regular 3.0T in a few weeks, rather than waiting for the S, but continue drooling and be proud of the Vorsprung durch Technik.



.
Old 01-08-2013, 07:09 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
lmariorod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very nice indeed. With this SQ5 no mods needed. This looks to be putting out more HP and torque than my S5. Sweet indeed...lets see if the wife is willing to trade her '10 Q5 for this...hoping she will.
Old 01-08-2013, 07:13 AM
  #15  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Parsec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 935
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dsackman
Looks like a great car and I am drooling. Astounded the amount of power they are getting from the 3.0l motor and that there is really nothing from BMW or Mercedes, or anyone else (except the new baby Cayenne) for that matter, that competes.

However my practical side asks whether I will ever use all that S stuff in every day driving. There are diminishing returns the higher up you go and the regular 3.0T is plenty. For $60,000 odd I will rather get a dedicated sportster to get the cob-webs out weekends.

Looks like I will be saving $20,000 by taking delivery of a regular 3.0T in a few weeks, rather than waiting for the S, but continue drooling and be proud of the Vorsprung durch Technik.



.
What about the ML63 AMG?
Old 01-08-2013, 07:56 AM
  #16  
AudiWorld Member
 
dsackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Parsec
What about the ML63 AMG?
Much larger vehicle in a different class.

Jeep also has/had something like a SRT8 or something like that, but a different class altogether.


.
Old 01-08-2013, 08:07 AM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
 
Heresy64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Duhrooool, duhrooool!
Old 01-08-2013, 09:42 AM
  #18  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ThunderDent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Huntington/Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dsackman
Looks like a great car and I am drooling. Astounded the amount of power they are getting from the 3.0l motor and that there is really nothing from BMW or Mercedes, or anyone else (except the new baby Cayenne) for that matter, that competes.

However my practical side asks whether I will ever use all that S stuff in every day driving. There are diminishing returns the higher up you go and the regular 3.0T is plenty. For $60,000 odd I will rather get a dedicated sportster to get the cob-webs out weekends.

Looks like I will be saving $20,000 by taking delivery of a regular 3.0T in a few weeks, rather than waiting for the S, but continue drooling and be proud of the Vorsprung durch Technik.



.
Building out my Q5 to the same HP/torque numbers (I should be at about 365/395), I started at 43K, and will prob have about 12-14K in mods (not counting sold items). So I've done it for maybe $5-7K cheaper than a built out SQ5.

If it would have been here before I would have gotten the SQ5 however.


I feel the same tho. If I'm gonna plunk down another 60-70, it very well would be on an RS5

Last edited by ThunderDent; 01-08-2013 at 06:24 PM.
Old 01-08-2013, 10:48 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,887
Received 353 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Comparison engines in SQ5 : TDI and TFSI

SQ5 3.0TFSI 260 kW (354 hp) 470 Nm /4000-4500 rpm 0-100 km/h 5.3s

SQ5 3.0TDI 230 kW (313 HP) 650 Nm /1450-2800 rmp 0-100 km/h 5,1s


TDI though it has 41 less horsepower has better acceleration from 0-100 km / h

This is due to the high torque TDI 650Nm comparing with 470 Nm .

Torque is the one who is responsible for the acceleration
Old 01-08-2013, 10:52 AM
  #20  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ThunderDent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Huntington/Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

TDI = low-end torque BEAST!


Quick Reply: SQ5 to premier at Detroit Auto Show



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 AM.