Confirmed - 2.0T 4 cylinder for 2011
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Confirmed - 2.0T 4 cylinder for 2011
My dealer confirmed that the 2.0T gas engine from the A4/A5 will be available as the base model Q5 for 2011 starting this fall. To me that is good news. If it seems OK on a test drive that's what I'll probably get to replace my 2008 A4. I guess it could lead to the kind of firestorm we saw on the A5 discussion when it was introduced last year. Many A5/S5 owners feel it lessens the perceived value and/or exclusivity of their V6 and V8 models. This engine has been available in the Q5 in Europe for some time and the tests I have seen are positive. Anyone else happy to see this engine coming to the Q5?
#2
AudiWorld Super User
My dealer confirmed that the 2.0T gas engine from the A4/A5 will be available as the base model Q5 for 2011 starting this fall. To me that is good news. If it seems OK on a test drive that's what I'll probably get to replace my 2008 A4. I guess it could lead to the kind of firestorm we saw on the A5 discussion when it was introduced last year. Many A5/S5 owners feel it lessens the perceived value and/or exclusivity of their V6 and V8 models. This engine has been available in the Q5 in Europe for some time and the tests I have seen are positive. Anyone else happy to see this engine coming to the Q5?
#3
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Don't forget, the 2.0 has more torque than the 3.2. Torque is considered very important in SUV's in terms of getting heavier loads moving, especially at lower speeds. Most Q5 owners in the US are not likely to be loading their Q5's down, so I don’t know how relevant this point will be. I believe I read 0-60 is like .6 seconds slower with the 2.0T which might annoy a lot of people, but would be fine for me if the MPG's are significantly better with the 2.0. If it is not that more economical, then I would probably go for the 3.2 myself.
#4
AudiWorld Super User
Test numbers aside, I own a A6 and drove the 2.0T A4 quite a few times. The 3.2 is quicker than the 2.0T and the 3.2 i2 quieter as well. Personally, I would not pay $40K+ for a 4 cyl SUV.
#5
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Not to go too far off topic, but I read recently Mercedes is going to be offering a 4-cylinder in the S Class in a few years, but apparently not in the C or E. This seems so crazy to me. It is almost as if economy and smaller engines are the status way to go these days to prove that even the rich are just "regular Joes". Hybrids are in many ways pointless, but there is apparently great prestige in owning one - that's one I never got either.
#6
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, having options and variety is a good thing. The 2.0T has a good track record, I hope they tweak it to give more hp like for the TT. Personally I love the 3.2L and the only engine I would prefer over it is the 3.0TDI
#7
AudiWorld Super User
Not to go too far off topic, but I read recently Mercedes is going to be offering a 4-cylinder in the S Class in a few years, but apparently not in the C or E. This seems so crazy to me. It is almost as if economy and smaller engines are the status way to go these days to prove that even the rich are just "regular Joes". Hybrids are in many ways pointless, but there is apparently great prestige in owning one - that's one I never got either.
Trending Topics
#8
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
I drive just me 98% of the time and never carry a lot of things, so I am hoping the 2.0T would be sufficient for my aging right foot. For families and normal people I agree with you. Also, I don't need an SUV but will probably get a Q5 simply becasue I cannot stand the interior (mostly dash and standard seats) on the B8 A4. To me the interior of the Q5 is the best Audi is currently offering - the A4, A5. A6 all have what I call "acres of ugly fake aluminum plastic" around the instrument cluster and strange seam lines on the seats like a Honda Fit or Mazda 3. Seriously.
#9
AudiWorld Super User
I drive just me 98% of the time and never carry a lot of things, so I am hoping the 2.0T would be sufficient for my aging right foot. For families and normal people I agree with you. Also, I don't need an SUV but will probably get a Q5 simply becasue I cannot stand the interior (mostly dash and standard seats) on the B8 A4. To me the interior of the Q5 is the best Audi is currently offering - the A4, A5. A6 all have what I call "acres of ugly fake aluminum plastic" around the instrument cluster and strange seam lines on the seats like a Honda Fit or Mazda 3. Seriously.
The Q5's interior for teh most part is the same as the A4 and A5. The A4 still come with wood trims on some models I believe. I am with you on not liking the aluminum trims, it makes the car look cheap and cold. As far as the seats, the Q5's seats are ok, a bit better than the A4, but not much. The inerior and seats are much better in the A6 and A8.