Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

TDI vs SQ5

Old 07-21-2014, 07:12 AM
  #31  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
idale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Q5 TDI
I went for the TDI and have no regrets - as another poster said - it's not my fun car though. I have a Miata for hooligan activities. The TDI is really amazing on the road - it just eats miles and returns ridiculous MPG with passing power that rarely ever needs a downshift.
The TDI's my "fun car"! But I always have the family car, so I'm probably just easier to please on the "fun" scale. Fits the family, can carry a decent bit of stuff, and I can tear around town pretty well (there's faster cars out there, but I wouldn't be able to actually use anything more other than at the track, so it's not much of a loss for me). Everyone's different though.


Originally Posted by scrmorling
I can't resist chiming in on this. Let me firstly say that, if I had a choice of the row SQ5, i.e., the biturbo TDI, I would jump at it. However, the US spec SQ5 is a pretty darn good alternative. Yes we give up plenty of low end grunt but that 354bhp feels pretty good to me.

Who is to say what is real? The only compromise that I'm aware of is the ride height which probably makes a difference if you're driving at the limit but, in the driving that I do, it's very stable and comfortably firm. Yes I would prefer the looks if it were 1.3" or so lower but I still love driving it every time I get in it.

Steve
They're both real, of course, though I playfully call the TDI the "real" one, too, both because it's the first and the best (even if only by a small amount), as well as jealousy that we don't get it here (though then I would've been sorely tempted to spend the extra for an S and I really didn't want to, hehe). But getting 99% of the way there isn't much to be sad to "settle for".

I'd love to see us getting TDI S models here (like that RS5 TDI concept, anyone?), but consumers here still aren't necessarily on board enough with diesel yet and it sounds like the TDI SQ5 wasn't going to meet emissions here anyway so they couldn't bring it to NA without some amount of redesign as it was. So petrol SQ5 or nothing? I think the souped-up 3.0T isn't such a bad option.
Old 07-21-2014, 10:15 AM
  #32  
AudiWorld Member
 
sdiver68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mannelito
So I assume you have spent a lot of time comparing the EU version and the US version on the road then, so you know what you are talking about, yes?
Nope and you missed my point. If you want the OEM Euro suspension on either the US SQ5 or the TDI, you need to buy it and it would cost the same to swap out the parts. Or you could also go the coilover route, again same cost either way.

Facts are facts, the US SQ5 does not come with the original SQ5 team engineered suspension. Ride height is changed to comply with US regulations. This is not a matter of opinion. If you want an opinion, how about Audi themselves talking about lower center of gravity for better handling in their own press releases?

For me, that combined with also not getting the SQ5 diesel were factors in my personal decision, as I posted my opinion and mine alone.

Last edited by sdiver68; 07-21-2014 at 10:28 AM.
Old 07-21-2014, 04:12 PM
  #33  
Club AutoUnion
 
scrmorling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,003
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by idale
I'd love to see us getting TDI S models here (like that RS5 TDI concept, anyone?)
+1 Steve
Old 07-22-2014, 07:21 AM
  #34  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Yoshimura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,179
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by idale
But of course if you've got the S bug then "close" isn't necessarily close enough, and if you don't really care about range or fuel costs, and if you want access to the things the S gets that you can't get on the regular Q5, then it may be worth the extra to step up ($69/mo lease, plus whatever the difference in fuel costs, plus any difference in resale value at the end -- TDIs traditionally hold value extremely well, but I think S models do too).
I checked residial values on audi.ca...

2 years, 10k per year
56% for TDI
54% for SQ5 and Q5 2.0T/3.0T

4 years, 15k per year
39% for TDI
37% for SQ5 and Q5 2.0T/3.0T
Old 07-22-2014, 07:13 PM
  #35  
AudiWorld Member
 
Chuck2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 230
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yoshimura
I checked residial values on audi.ca...

2 years, 10k per year
56% for TDI
54% for SQ5 and Q5 2.0T/3.0T

4 years, 15k per year
39% for TDI
37% for SQ5 and Q5 2.0T/3.0T
I'm surprised...really. Never seen it that way. I feel like they are worth a lot more than 37-39%. 2% is not enough to be noticable. Though in reality, I feel you'll have more ease to liquidate a TDI.

I'd say Q5 family gets 45-50% after 4 years no ?
Old 07-23-2014, 10:53 AM
  #36  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
David&Niki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck2006
I'm surprised...really. Never seen it that way. I feel like they are worth a lot more than 37-39%. 2% is not enough to be noticable. Though in reality, I feel you'll have more ease to liquidate a TDI.

I'd say Q5 family gets 45-50% after 4 years no ?
Chuck, for 4 years we are looking at 100,000~11000km, half price from brand new Q5, i would buy that... firmly price
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dht34
A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
13
05-29-2009 11:30 AM
Bklyn_Quattro
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
9
04-07-2008 09:54 AM
sillyboy
RS4 (B7 Platform) Discussion
3
10-02-2006 06:45 AM
kmw
TT (Mk1) Discussion
26
09-23-2003 04:03 AM
Brilliant
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
8
11-19-2000 03:00 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: TDI vs SQ5



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM.