Stage 3+ dyno from KTR
 

<center><img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/15175/ktr_its_rsk04.jpg"></center><p>Hi Everyone,

Here is a dyno plot from a car that was just completed at KTR.

Please, let's not start a this dyno sucks post. That is why I had them compare a stock S4, so we could all see the difference.

Mods:
Big-Port heads
RS4 Cams
RS4 intake manifold
RS4 Throttle Body
RS4 IC's and up-pipes
HSSSK045's from ITS
AWE MAF w/straightener and Software with sauce from Moss
LaBree DP's (Tantrumwerks.com)
BTW the plots are both on 93 octane

The sauce was off the shelf sauce with a Piggie MBC set up to only limit the initial overshoot. This is a problem on the bigger turbos if the sauce is not tuned for them.

Everyone was pretty impressed with the power it put out on pump fuel...

Did Franz fax that copy over to you!!

i guess that answers what fuel was used i posted this below

I assume these are the same?
 

<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/1697654.phtml">Previous post</a></li></ul>

Some other dyno sheets off that dyno
 

<ul><li><a href="http://www.ktrperformance.com/services/Dyno_Graphs/graph_main.htm">The wall of fame, and shame..</a></li></ul>

Re: Did Franz fax that copy over to you!!
 

No. They emailed me a copy.

How do you know that crazy Fk?

Re: I assume these are the same?
 

Oops. Didn't see that below.

Yes they are the same.

Jeff

I speak to him very often, in person of course.

Nice pull. What's the 1/4 look like? And...
 

why in the h3ll hasn't someone done a work around for that whacky MAF other than to use a stock straightener which would flow even less than a Hitachi S4 stock housing?

Impressed... wondering how much more is in it.

We tracked a car with and w/o the wacky straightener-
 

Less than a .5 mph difference.

Could have just been changes in conditions.

I don't thing it makes a difference. Diego made a super custom "D-Flo" and only picked on .1 on the FATS test. Well within just a normal variation.

Jeff