Is it OK or not?
 

Regarding the cartoons and other drawings of the Prophet Muhammad, what is AudiWorld's official position regarding Politics Forum members posting of the depictions and links to same?

I'm thinking it's a violation and the posts should be deleted.

My question is directed mostly to the owners of AW.

Weak, Paldi.
 

Radical Islam wins a little one, right there. That comment is for the mods, too.

And the link was to a story that claims the radical Islamics inserted several much more inciteful cartoons, than anything ever printed, and then circulated the "enhanced" set.

Don't forget to delete Raptor Jesus as well...
 

Man, you've jumped the shark.

orly????
 

<center><img src="http://www.crimelibrary.com/graphics/photos/terrorists_spies/terrorists/palestinians/4-3-Masked-Islamic-Jihad-milita.jpg"></center><p>.

equal treatment under the Audiworld gods

Let's get rid of all the VW Edsels, too.

extremely lame
 

censorship is always wrong. period.

Violation of what?
 

Let's review: Stories about the demonstrations relating to the cartoons dominate the news; the cartoons and the events they have precipitated are thus clearly newsworthy; some on AW have inquired what the newsworthy cartoons look like, and what they say; in response, some people have posted certain of the cartoons and/or links to where they might be found on the internet, thus advancing discussion of newsworthy events. What does this, in your view, "violate"?

Depends on what your definition of "is" is... :-)
 

You agree, through your use of the Discussion Forums, that you will not post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.

The images are all or some of the following to billions of believers:

1. knowingly false
2. defamatory
3. inaccurate
4. abusive
5. vulgar
6. hateful
7. harassing
8. obscene
9. profane
10. sexually oriented
11. threatening
12. invasive of a person's privacy
13. violative of any law.

You decide...

And my post that was deleted had none of that.
 

It linked to a site that had the images published in Denmark.

People who can't put up with their religion being ridiculed have no business trying to live in the West.