Am I nuts for considering a '96 Land Rover Discovery? Only 77k miles on it!!!
#1
Am I nuts for considering a '96 Land Rover Discovery? Only 77k miles on it!!!
I'm just looking for an SUV in the $6,000 price range that we would use for weekend getaways and trips to the lake/river with the dog this summer. I went and looked at a '96 Rover Discovery last night and it's in fantastic shape and only has 77k miles as I mentioned. The tires only have a couple of thousand miles on them and he just put new brakes on and he's asking $5,700 which is right in line with KBB. The consumer reviews are pretty funny to read..about 50/50 people telling you to grab your wallet and run away fast to people saying they love their Discovery and would never consider another SUV. Anybody got any insight on these cars and advice on whether or not I should pull the trigger?
I also looked at a 95 Mitsubishi Montero that has 143,000 miles on it for $4,700. It's in really great shape as well, but has a few little quirks that would need fixing (sunroof doesn't work, rear driver's side window doesn't work so it sounds like it's got some electrical problems going on).
So, just trying to weigh the potential maintenance on a Land Rover with 77k miles vs. a Mitsubishi with 143k miles.
I also looked at a 95 Mitsubishi Montero that has 143,000 miles on it for $4,700. It's in really great shape as well, but has a few little quirks that would need fixing (sunroof doesn't work, rear driver's side window doesn't work so it sounds like it's got some electrical problems going on).
So, just trying to weigh the potential maintenance on a Land Rover with 77k miles vs. a Mitsubishi with 143k miles.
#3
I always liked them, but would never buy one based on all the horror stories I've heard.
Its a buyers market now, so I wouldn't pay book value for much of anything.
If you can get for a lot under book maybe, so you have some money toward future repairs/maintenance.
If you can get for a lot under book maybe, so you have some money toward future repairs/maintenance.
#5
I've had a few Land Rovers...
For $6k or so, you could get into a 1999-2000 DIscovery II. A bit bigger, looks better, nicer interior and better options. Only reason to choose a DI over a DII to some people is offroad capability, some prefer the DI.
Reliability is about the same, small quirks here and there but usually easy and relatively inexpensive fixes.
Checkout the website www.Discoweb.org
The key to Land Rovers are keeping up with maintenance, (they are easy cars to work on yourself if you want to) and they are good cars.
Neglected, lots of stuff will start to go wrong.
Reliability is about the same, small quirks here and there but usually easy and relatively inexpensive fixes.
Checkout the website www.Discoweb.org
The key to Land Rovers are keeping up with maintenance, (they are easy cars to work on yourself if you want to) and they are good cars.
Neglected, lots of stuff will start to go wrong.
Trending Topics
#8
a comment.....
Had a similar experience awhile back. We have a neighbor up north who runs a business in LR restoration/repair. The word I got from him for series 1 trucks was, the 1998 was the best year to buy due to a number upgrades done. They seem to have lots of electrical problems along with motors going(wiper, etc.).
You might look at an older 4runner or Land Cruiser which are both bullit proof. We ended up with a low mile 4runner that has been amazing.
Regards
You might look at an older 4runner or Land Cruiser which are both bullit proof. We ended up with a low mile 4runner that has been amazing.
Regards
#10
I'll second that, newer with lower miles is the way to go, but i'd still go DII over DI
and if you want super reliable, a 4Runner or Land Cruise is great, but they generally cost more, and I think LR's are nicer and have more character.