Audi e-tron / Q8 e-tron Discussion forums for the electric Audi e-tron SUV.

175kw (!?) / Big Sur / Grapevine / I-5 update / Valet question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2021, 08:21 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
WetEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 708
Received 185 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skaven81
Why not? Assuming that 140 miles is round-trip, that seems perfectly reasonable to me -- though of course I can't imagine spending 3 hours a day driving to and from work.

But from a technology/reliability perspective, I see absolutely no reason why one wouldn't charge to 90% every night (~180 miles of range), drive to and from work, and arrive home with ~40 miles left, then charge up again overnight. Could probably even pull it off only charging to 80% with the extra range in the newer models.

There's nothing wrong with cycling a lithium battery like that. It would be one thing if this was going to be DC fast charged every day. But normal L2 charging? No big deal. The battery is designed for this -- that's why it has buffers. What's the point of engineering a car that can't be used to the full potential of its battery?
1) Reserve for bad weather. Having to stop in bad weather for a charge wouldn't be ideal.

2) Batteries degrade with time and cycles, and keeping the car longer term. Still want to drive the route after years, and the battery is down to 80% of original capacity?

3) Deep cycling batteries reduce lifetime. This is why batteries have buffers. Note that "equivalent full cycles" is the same using the full range of the car, 204 miles (or whatever), and that could be one trip of 204 miles, 2 trips of 102 miles, or 10 trips of 20.4 miles.

Source is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143


1000 EFCs would be 204,000 miles. This shows the full range, buffers are not included but would remove the worst part of the cycles for lifetime.

Warnings: this is an older battery chemistry, that was in wide use a decade ago. I don't know about newer battery chemistries, as I'm no longer designing battery powered equipment. While this sort of characteristic was common between different chemistries then, it might be different in newer chemistries, and newer chemistries are different. I am not a real battery expert, I've once shared an office with one. This is cycling loss only, there is also time based (or calendar) loss to consider.

With this chart, notice that drastically more miles can be driven by using a smaller fraction of the battery's capacity. The ideal amount to use on daily trips is perhaps someplace between 20% and 50% between charges.

Last edited by WetEV; 11-19-2021 at 08:53 AM.
Old 11-19-2021, 10:05 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JNealCox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,122
Received 538 Likes on 399 Posts
Default

Run some ABRP scenarios. If you don't want to charge at all during that 140 mile trek, my concern would be with the return trip. You want to make sure you have enough in the tank to make it over the crest during that very inefficient climbing part of the trip.
Old 11-19-2021, 12:06 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
skaven81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 764
Received 371 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WetEV
3) Deep cycling batteries reduce lifetime. This is why batteries have buffers. Note that "equivalent full cycles" is the same using the full range of the car, 204 miles (or whatever), and that could be one trip of 204 miles, 2 trips of 102 miles, or 10 trips of 20.4 miles.

Source is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143
[chart]
This isn't a fair look at the situation. That's a 1C charge curve -- that would mean deep cycling the battery at 95kW, or DC fast charging every time. L2 charging at home is ~0.1C and so the damage to the battery is GREATLY reduced. If anything, the chart you shared shows that even if you DCFC every day, that the battery will still retain a reasonable capacity after ~200k miles. To me, this actually supports my assertion and suggests that using the car in this way is just fine.
Old 11-19-2021, 12:39 PM
  #14  
Terlonz
 
mtberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 838
Received 272 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skaven81
This isn't a fair look at the situation. That's a 1C charge curve -- that would mean deep cycling the battery at 95kW, or DC fast charging every time. L2 charging at home is ~0.1C and so the damage to the battery is GREATLY reduced. If anything, the chart you shared shows that even if you DCFC every day, that the battery will still retain a reasonable capacity after ~200k miles. To me, this actually supports my assertion and suggests that using the car in this way is just fine.
Yep. A little off topic but degradation isn't really a relevant issue with the e-tron. Audi owners plug it in at home. Audi has been transparent about their conservative battery strategy. The e-tron could be incredibly fast and have a higher EPA range number, but they didn't go for any of that.
Old 11-19-2021, 02:16 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
jim0607's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kidentist
These are pretty cars and I've certainly "thought about" trading my Q7 at one point or another for an Etron; however, my main concern is the mediocre range for such a nice EV. Does anyone have experience with these going over a mountain pass in winter?
Reason I ask is my/our main commute takes us from Yakima to Bellevue using I-90, which in the winter can get iffy. I'm ok charging at my destination, but if it can't even make the 140 mile trip without stopping I am out.
I frequently drive from Bellevue to Cle Elum roundtrip (150 miles) in 35 degree wet roads. I'm heavy footed, have the heat pumping, music up, and in winter it can get close. I'll typically get home with about 10%-15% battery remaining. I will be doing the drive more frequently in snow, so I have purchased a set of snow tires and am curious how that will impact the range. I'm assuming I will have to be a little more cautious, but that said, the slower speeds might make up the difference for snow/snow tires. In the summer there is NO issue, I would get home with plenty of range. We also find that when we do fast charge, the car is typically full before we are ready to go!
Old 11-20-2021, 05:25 AM
  #16  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
WetEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 708
Received 185 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skaven81
This isn't a fair look at the situation. That's a 1C charge curve -- that would mean deep cycling the battery at 95kW, or DC fast charging every time. L2 charging at home is ~0.1C and so the damage to the battery is GREATLY reduced. If anything, the chart you shared shows that even if you DCFC every day, that the battery will still retain a reasonable capacity after ~200k miles. To me, this actually supports my assertion and suggests that using the car in this way is just fine.
I agree, to a point. The paper's test conditions of 1C charge/discharge rate and 35C temperature are both higher than usual for the e-tron. Both charge rate and temperature will increase the rate at which the damage to the battery happens, so yes, reduction in capacity is slower than what that graph showed. And just as important, today's cells are better than the cells sold a decade ago. Charging at 0.1C is ideal, but boost power is 300kW or about a 3C discharge rate, and that's higher than ideal. Net impact? I don't know, ask a real battery expert.

My point wasn't any specific prediction as to life, but rather to point out that deep cycling batteries shorten life. That probably will not matter to anyone leasing, because they wouldn't be driving 340 miles a day very often. At 5 days a week, that's 85,000 miles a year. As the distance is getting close to what can be driven without an extra charge stop in bad weather, any loss of range will have an impact.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmp470
Audi e-tron / Q8 e-tron
16
03-23-2021 06:34 PM
DD (CA)
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
4
09-21-2006 05:37 PM
Soner-O
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
6
03-23-2006 02:19 AM
SnailA4(WhaleA4)
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
6
03-15-2004 07:34 PM
Trey (at pitt)
TT (Mk1) Discussion
10
01-22-2003 05:26 PM



Quick Reply: 175kw (!?) / Big Sur / Grapevine / I-5 update / Valet question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 PM.