175kw (!?) / Big Sur / Grapevine / I-5 update / Valet question
#11
AudiWorld Senior Member
Why not? Assuming that 140 miles is round-trip, that seems perfectly reasonable to me -- though of course I can't imagine spending 3 hours a day driving to and from work.
But from a technology/reliability perspective, I see absolutely no reason why one wouldn't charge to 90% every night (~180 miles of range), drive to and from work, and arrive home with ~40 miles left, then charge up again overnight. Could probably even pull it off only charging to 80% with the extra range in the newer models.
There's nothing wrong with cycling a lithium battery like that. It would be one thing if this was going to be DC fast charged every day. But normal L2 charging? No big deal. The battery is designed for this -- that's why it has buffers. What's the point of engineering a car that can't be used to the full potential of its battery?
But from a technology/reliability perspective, I see absolutely no reason why one wouldn't charge to 90% every night (~180 miles of range), drive to and from work, and arrive home with ~40 miles left, then charge up again overnight. Could probably even pull it off only charging to 80% with the extra range in the newer models.
There's nothing wrong with cycling a lithium battery like that. It would be one thing if this was going to be DC fast charged every day. But normal L2 charging? No big deal. The battery is designed for this -- that's why it has buffers. What's the point of engineering a car that can't be used to the full potential of its battery?
2) Batteries degrade with time and cycles, and keeping the car longer term. Still want to drive the route after years, and the battery is down to 80% of original capacity?
3) Deep cycling batteries reduce lifetime. This is why batteries have buffers. Note that "equivalent full cycles" is the same using the full range of the car, 204 miles (or whatever), and that could be one trip of 204 miles, 2 trips of 102 miles, or 10 trips of 20.4 miles.
Source is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143
1000 EFCs would be 204,000 miles. This shows the full range, buffers are not included but would remove the worst part of the cycles for lifetime.
Warnings: this is an older battery chemistry, that was in wide use a decade ago. I don't know about newer battery chemistries, as I'm no longer designing battery powered equipment. While this sort of characteristic was common between different chemistries then, it might be different in newer chemistries, and newer chemistries are different. I am not a real battery expert, I've once shared an office with one. This is cycling loss only, there is also time based (or calendar) loss to consider.
With this chart, notice that drastically more miles can be driven by using a smaller fraction of the battery's capacity. The ideal amount to use on daily trips is perhaps someplace between 20% and 50% between charges.
Last edited by WetEV; 11-19-2021 at 08:53 AM.
#12
AudiWorld Super User
Run some ABRP scenarios. If you don't want to charge at all during that 140 mile trek, my concern would be with the return trip. You want to make sure you have enough in the tank to make it over the crest during that very inefficient climbing part of the trip.
#13
3) Deep cycling batteries reduce lifetime. This is why batteries have buffers. Note that "equivalent full cycles" is the same using the full range of the car, 204 miles (or whatever), and that could be one trip of 204 miles, 2 trips of 102 miles, or 10 trips of 20.4 miles.
Source is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143
[chart]
Source is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143
[chart]
#14
This isn't a fair look at the situation. That's a 1C charge curve -- that would mean deep cycling the battery at 95kW, or DC fast charging every time. L2 charging at home is ~0.1C and so the damage to the battery is GREATLY reduced. If anything, the chart you shared shows that even if you DCFC every day, that the battery will still retain a reasonable capacity after ~200k miles. To me, this actually supports my assertion and suggests that using the car in this way is just fine.
#15
These are pretty cars and I've certainly "thought about" trading my Q7 at one point or another for an Etron; however, my main concern is the mediocre range for such a nice EV. Does anyone have experience with these going over a mountain pass in winter?
Reason I ask is my/our main commute takes us from Yakima to Bellevue using I-90, which in the winter can get iffy. I'm ok charging at my destination, but if it can't even make the 140 mile trip without stopping I am out.
Reason I ask is my/our main commute takes us from Yakima to Bellevue using I-90, which in the winter can get iffy. I'm ok charging at my destination, but if it can't even make the 140 mile trip without stopping I am out.
#16
AudiWorld Senior Member
This isn't a fair look at the situation. That's a 1C charge curve -- that would mean deep cycling the battery at 95kW, or DC fast charging every time. L2 charging at home is ~0.1C and so the damage to the battery is GREATLY reduced. If anything, the chart you shared shows that even if you DCFC every day, that the battery will still retain a reasonable capacity after ~200k miles. To me, this actually supports my assertion and suggests that using the car in this way is just fine.
My point wasn't any specific prediction as to life, but rather to point out that deep cycling batteries shorten life. That probably will not matter to anyone leasing, because they wouldn't be driving 340 miles a day very often. At 5 days a week, that's 85,000 miles a year. As the distance is getting close to what can be driven without an extra charge stop in bad weather, any loss of range will have an impact.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SnailA4(WhaleA4)
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
6
03-15-2004 07:34 PM