Notices
Audi allroad Discussion forum for the original Audi allroad

Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 11:20 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
HR-ALL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...

<ul><li><a href="http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/Search-Results/Long-term-tests/Audi-Allroad-30-TDi/">...what we are all missing across the pond.</a></li></ul>
Old 01-10-2009, 12:34 PM
  #2  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
Mplsspyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...

I know I'm jealous. Would love to have one of those.
Thank for the link.
Old 01-10-2009, 04:00 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Member
 
incrementalg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I want one too
Old 01-10-2009, 04:34 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Studly_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Interesting story, but the reviewer: 'Okay, so it's essentially a jacked up A6 Avant Quatt

They say:
"Audi is falling behind BMW in its engine technology to the extent that a petrol-powered 530i Touring is actually a couple of mpg more economical than my 3.0-litre TDi Allroad. In its defence, the Audi is at least matching its official 32.5mpg combined figure and managing near 40mpg on leisurely motorway strolls.

The 2.7 costs £1515 less to buy than the 3.0 but is significantly slower and its eco numbers are almost identical. On the plus side it comes as standard with an auto 'box, a £1400 option with the bigger motor, but essential nonetheless. The downside is it's a CVT: great for economy; hell for the ears with all those slipping clutch sound effects. The 3.0's auto is a proper auto, the engines's 332lb ft of torque being too much for the CVT to handle. The other drivetrain options are 3.2 and 4.2 petrols, neither of which makes any sense. The 4.2 is hugely fast but costs nearly £50k. The 3.2 gobbles fuel at the same rate and is no faster than the 3.0 diesel yet costs £1000 more.

The slush 'box wasn't our only indulgence..."
Old 01-10-2009, 05:23 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
drivingforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I would prefer a £10k car to get 100 MPG, and I shant rest my chip hole 'till then.

And I thought Americans were snobby. I think that guy needs to ride a bicycle for awhile. Or a horse.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Force-1
Q7 MKII Discussion
2
01-12-2022 09:15 AM
Fithian
Rocky Mountain Discussion
1
07-21-2011 10:12 AM
3707
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
1
12-23-2005 09:32 PM
jclarkv
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
1
06-02-2005 10:56 AM
golem
Audi allroad
11
03-11-2005 05:27 PM



Quick Reply: Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 PM.