Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...
#1
Audi Allroad 3.0 TDI long-term test review...
<ul><li><a href="http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/Search-Results/Long-term-tests/Audi-Allroad-30-TDi/">...what we are all missing across the pond.</a></li></ul>
#4
Interesting story, but the reviewer: 'Okay, so it's essentially a jacked up A6 Avant Quatt
They say:
"Audi is falling behind BMW in its engine technology to the extent that a petrol-powered 530i Touring is actually a couple of mpg more economical than my 3.0-litre TDi Allroad. In its defence, the Audi is at least matching its official 32.5mpg combined figure and managing near 40mpg on leisurely motorway strolls.
The 2.7 costs £1515 less to buy than the 3.0 but is significantly slower and its eco numbers are almost identical. On the plus side it comes as standard with an auto 'box, a £1400 option with the bigger motor, but essential nonetheless. The downside is it's a CVT: great for economy; hell for the ears with all those slipping clutch sound effects. The 3.0's auto is a proper auto, the engines's 332lb ft of torque being too much for the CVT to handle. The other drivetrain options are 3.2 and 4.2 petrols, neither of which makes any sense. The 4.2 is hugely fast but costs nearly £50k. The 3.2 gobbles fuel at the same rate and is no faster than the 3.0 diesel yet costs £1000 more.
The slush 'box wasn't our only indulgence..."
"Audi is falling behind BMW in its engine technology to the extent that a petrol-powered 530i Touring is actually a couple of mpg more economical than my 3.0-litre TDi Allroad. In its defence, the Audi is at least matching its official 32.5mpg combined figure and managing near 40mpg on leisurely motorway strolls.
The 2.7 costs £1515 less to buy than the 3.0 but is significantly slower and its eco numbers are almost identical. On the plus side it comes as standard with an auto 'box, a £1400 option with the bigger motor, but essential nonetheless. The downside is it's a CVT: great for economy; hell for the ears with all those slipping clutch sound effects. The 3.0's auto is a proper auto, the engines's 332lb ft of torque being too much for the CVT to handle. The other drivetrain options are 3.2 and 4.2 petrols, neither of which makes any sense. The 4.2 is hugely fast but costs nearly £50k. The 3.2 gobbles fuel at the same rate and is no faster than the 3.0 diesel yet costs £1000 more.
The slush 'box wasn't our only indulgence..."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Force-1
Q7 MKII Discussion
2
01-12-2022 09:15 AM