Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 Coupe & Cabrio (B9) Discussion forum for the B9 Audi A5, S5 and RS5 Coupe and Cabriolet 2018 model year and up

How many of you use a Faraday shield bag for your key fobs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2018, 11:35 AM
  #111  
Permanent S Mode Member
 
MH62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,829
Received 573 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
The power is transmitted from the fob, the receiver is a passive device.
Receivers are complex devices, they are not passive. They include a bunch of powered active electronic components whose job it is to filter out the unwanted signals and amplify the narrow band where the the FOB signal is expected to be found. So yes, more money can possibly buy you a better receiver. Someone said in a previous post that you can easily build a 100x better receiver than the one in your car but take that with a grain of salt. Improving reception is not easy and not cheap so good luck building a cheap one 100 times better but don't think that because your car cuts off at 3 feet that this distance cannot be improved upon.

Last edited by MH62; 12-05-2018 at 11:42 AM.
Old 12-05-2018, 12:03 PM
  #112  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Redd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: 2014 Q5
Posts: 3,868
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Actually, if you put your keys on a belt clip, or in a hip pocket, and turn so that your whole body is directly in between the key fob and the Audi? The car may insist that there is no fob here, and refuse to open. This is sometimes called "body shadow" and is a larger problem that even effects handheld radios worn on the belt. (Which is one reason that police/fire radios often have an antenna up on the shoulder mic, in clearer space.)

Considering how long it takes a human being to move three feet, and how many times a radio can say "Hello?" in that time period, three feet is plenty generous. When GM's Chevrolet division put the first keyless entry system on Corvettes around 1990, they had a range or around twenty feet. Get that close to the car and it automatically unlocked for you. People complained. Automatic unlock went off the market.

With cars having 360-degree "backup" cameras now, how long will it take for one to have smartphone facial recognition, so the car only unlocks when the owner's FACE can be found? Iris recognition?

Fobs are just so...Your father's Oldsmobile?
Old 12-05-2018, 12:55 PM
  #113  
Permanent S Mode Member
 
MH62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,829
Received 573 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redd
When GM's Chevrolet division put the first keyless entry system on Corvettes around 1990, they had a range or around twenty feet. Get that close to the car and it automatically unlocked for you. People complained. Automatic unlock went off the market.
Yes, and based on that feedback, today's engineers most likely go out of their way to "detune" the car's receiver to make sure it doesn't work over 3 feet. So again, the 3-foot limit we currently observe between car and FOB is not the maximum distance doable.
Old 12-05-2018, 01:09 PM
  #114  
AudiWorld Super User
 
superswiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 7,382
Received 1,066 Likes on 741 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MH62
Receivers are complex devices, they are not passive. They include a bunch of powered active electronic components whose job it is to filter out the unwanted signals and amplify the narrow band where the the FOB signal is expected to be found. So yes, more money can possibly buy you a better receiver. Someone said in a previous post that you can easily build a 100x better receiver than the one in your car but take that with a grain of salt. Improving reception is not easy and not cheap so good luck building a cheap one 100 times better but don't think that because your car cuts off at 3 feet that this distance cannot be improved upon.
Receivers can definitely be built to pick up weak signals. No doubt there. It comes at a cost and bulk. Large antennas and such for example. If somebody really wants to get your car they can. Nothing is ever a 100% secure. It's generally a cost/reward equation. At some point it's not worth the cost anymore.
Old 12-05-2018, 01:55 PM
  #115  
AudiWorld Super User
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MH62
Receivers are complex devices, they are not passive. They include a bunch of powered active electronic components whose job it is to filter out the unwanted signals and amplify the narrow band where the the FOB signal is expected to be found. So yes, more money can possibly buy you a better receiver. Someone said in a previous post that you can easily build a 100x better receiver than the one in your car but take that with a grain of salt. Improving reception is not easy and not cheap so good luck building a cheap one 100 times better but don't think that because your car cuts off at 3 feet that this distance cannot be improved upon.
when you say powered active device, do you mean active as in the impedance of a RC filter. Or do you mean active as in transmitting power? Which a reciver does not do. True, receivers can have better frequency filter networks, but it still cannot amplify a signal that is not there. A bigger antenna would increase the receivers sensivity to pick up a weak signal, but I think most thieves do not walk around with a big antenna in one hand and a transceiver in the other hand.
Old 12-05-2018, 02:52 PM
  #116  
Permanent S Mode Member
 
MH62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,829
Received 573 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man


when you say powered active device, do you mean active as in the impedance of a RC filter. Or do you mean active as in transmitting power? Which a reciver does not do. True, receivers can have better frequency filter networks, but it still cannot amplify a signal that is not there. A bigger antenna would increase the receivers sensivity to pick up a weak signal, but I think most thieves do not walk around with a big antenna in one hand and a transceiver in the other hand.
As defined by wiki :
"Active components include amplifying components such as transistors, triode vacuum tubes (valves), and tunnel diodes.Passive components can't introduce net energy into the circuit. ... Passive components include two-terminalcomponents such as resistors, capacitors, inductors, and transformers."

It's actually quite hard to determine if a signal is there or not as it just doesn't stop but attenuates over distance. So for one receiver, the signal may be so low that it becomes just noise but another more capable receiver may be able to extract it.
Old 12-05-2018, 04:46 PM
  #117  
AudiWorld Super User
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MH62
As defined by wiki :
"Active components include amplifying components such as transistors, triode vacuum tubes (valves), and tunnel diodes.Passive components can't introduce net energy into the circuit. ... Passive components include two-terminalcomponents such as resistors, capacitors, inductors, and transformers."

It's actually quite hard to determine if a signal is there or not as it just doesn't stop but attenuates over distance. So for one receiver, the signal may be so low that it becomes just noise but another more capable receiver may be able to extract it.
You are right, passive is the wrong word as the amplier has active components such as capacitors, inductors and semiconductors. If the thieves have an expensive low noise amplier, they might be able to increase the pick up distance of the fob’s signal. In the pass, these low noise amplier are into the $100,000s, but with the price of cars getting more expensive, it might be be worth the theives’ Investment.
Old 12-05-2018, 07:48 PM
  #118  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Waggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
The range for the fob to alarm and unarm the car is a different system than the that actually starts the car. The range for the start is much shorter, less than 5 feet.
Plus, even if the relay can extend the signal inside the car to start it, that would be much riskier for the thieves, since starting the car would alert the owner while the one with the remote box is running back.
Old 12-05-2018, 10:16 PM
  #119  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 926
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waggin
Plus, even if the relay can extend the signal inside the car to start it, that would be much riskier for the thieves, since starting the car would alert the owner while the one with the remote box is running back.
In practice, it's usually too late by then. Cars have been stolen this way.
Old 12-05-2018, 10:17 PM
  #120  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 926
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superswiss
Receivers can definitely be built to pick up weak signals. No doubt there. It comes at a cost and bulk. Large antennas and such for example. If somebody really wants to get your car they can. Nothing is ever a 100% secure. It's generally a cost/reward equation. At some point it's not worth the cost anymore.
A Faraday shield is very cheap. 🙂


Quick Reply: How many of you use a Faraday shield bag for your key fobs?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 PM.