Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 Coupe & Cabrio (B9) Discussion forum for the B9 Audi A5, S5 and RS5 Coupe and Cabriolet 2018 model year and up

BMW's new inline 6's are insane. The S5/RS5 really need a power bump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2019, 10:26 AM
  #121  
AudiWorld Member
 
coupegt87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We recently purchased a X3 M40i and the car is a Beast... the B58 engine is a Gem, so smooooth, all the way to Redline. My friend who owns a Macan GTS drove it and is so jealous of the powertrain.
Old 02-01-2020, 08:38 AM
  #122  
AudiWorld Member
 
BlakeV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 448
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I plead guilty. Would never do this if a third party soul present.

It was a two lanes road with no traffic or even a squarrel except a stubborn GLC43 stuck in the left one. Speed was not excessive, I passed him on the right. He "reacted". Some stupid hormones kicked in in both of us and we both smashed it.

The S5 didn't disappoint but it took *everything*. There were some stops. I knew that the 5-60mph (acceleration from idle) on my car isn't the best (try 5.8s, within a tick of my Acura TLX V6) and the Mercedes was likely quicker (I verified - try 5.5s), so the stops were very "brief"..

At the end, even if both vehicles have very similar weight but the Merc has more HP, my car prevailed but it made me remember this thread....

+20-30 HP would be nice, but the 7-speed S-Tronic transmission found in the A6 could help.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...k-test-review/
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/

Last edited by BlakeV; 02-01-2020 at 08:45 AM.
Old 02-01-2020, 10:42 AM
  #123  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlakeV
The S5 didn't disappoint but it took *everything*. There were some stops. I knew that the 5-60mph (acceleration from idle) on my car isn't the best (try 5.8s, within a tick of my Acura TLX V6) and the Mercedes was likely quicker (I verified - try 5.5s), so the stops were very "brief"..
/
That C&D 5-60 time for the S5 has always been suspiciously slow. The S5 has the same 0-60 time as the GLC43 (obviously launch and traction off the line are major factors), a slightly faster 1/4 time, 3 mph higher 1/4 mile trap speed, but 0.3s slower 5-60 time. The TLX isn't even close to the S5 in most measures, with more than 1s slower 1/4 mile time and 8 mph slower trap speed. The A5 SB is also only 0.3s slower in the 5-60 measure, but again is over 1s slower in the 1/4 mile with 8 mph lower trap speed. I wonder if the AT shifts too lackadaisically when it is not brake torqued prior to launch.

Last edited by JD15; 02-01-2020 at 10:44 AM.
Old 02-01-2020, 09:21 PM
  #124  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 926
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlakeV
It was more about this part; "Overall I like the characteristics of the 2.9 better. More responsive and less lag." a
What about that is confusing?
Old 02-02-2020, 03:23 AM
  #125  
AudiWorld Member
 
IamRacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 248
Received 79 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD15
That C&D 5-60 time for the S5 has always been suspiciously slow. The S5 has the same 0-60 time as the GLC43 (obviously launch and traction off the line are major factors), a slightly faster 1/4 time, 3 mph higher 1/4 mile trap speed, but 0.3s slower 5-60 time. The TLX isn't even close to the S5 in most measures, with more than 1s slower 1/4 mile time and 8 mph slower trap speed. The A5 SB is also only 0.3s slower in the 5-60 measure, but again is over 1s slower in the 1/4 mile with 8 mph lower trap speed. I wonder if the AT shifts too lackadaisically when it is not brake torqued prior to launch.
I wonder if the lackluster 5-60 time has to do with the S5 starting at 5mph in 2nd gear and not kicking down. The C&D procedure leaves the car in auto. I have read the S5 seems to want to start in 2nd gear a lot. I wouldn’t be surprised if that is part of the reason for that time.
The following users liked this post:
Slides (02-02-2020)
Old 02-02-2020, 04:30 AM
  #126  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mister Bally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA
Posts: 6,312
Received 117 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

You were running premium fuel as recommended, correct?
Old 02-02-2020, 05:50 AM
  #127  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IamRacerX
I wonder if the lackluster 5-60 time has to do with the S5 starting at 5mph in 2nd gear and not kicking down. The C&D procedure leaves the car in auto. I have read the S5 seems to want to start in 2nd gear a lot. I wouldn’t be surprised if that is part of the reason for that time.
You may be on to something, as the time is incongruous with the rest of the S5's times compared to other similar cars. The RS5 fairs better in this regard, as the gap between 0-60 and 5-60 is only 1s (3.6s vs. 4.6s). The A5 is even better with only 0.8s slower 5-60 compared to 0-60, whereas the S5 has a 1.5s gap, which is one of the largest I have ever seen in C&D.
Old 02-02-2020, 06:40 AM
  #128  
AudiWorld Super User
 
SCarGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 5,806
Received 1,091 Likes on 770 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT-S4
On torque and HP:

It's not just the peak torque number that matters. It's how much and how long torque can be sustained along an engine's rev band.
If an engine has a "peaky" engine it could have a peak torque of 300lb ft, but it only hits that peak for 200rpm, and has a steep climb off idle to peak and then a sharp drop to red line.
That engine wouldn't feel and perform as powerfully as an engine that has a peak torque of 280lb ft. but achieves 80% of that from 400rpm off idle and sustains that torque for 3000rpm, hits the peak at 4500rpm and then slowly levels off to 80% again to near red line.

An engine that can produce a good amount/percentage of its power along a wide rev range will move a vehicle from standing start to high speed more quickly compared to a peaky engine that produces a higher peak torque, but for a very short duration.
Of course, proper trans gearing is what transfers that power to the wheels, and the tires ability to grip the road surface is what puts the power into motion.
Torque is force, and "Horse Power" is calculated from Torque.

Here's a good read for anyone interested in torque and HP:
Power and Torque: Understanding the Relationship Between the Two, by EPI Inc.
And gearing

because nothing is transmitted to the ground without that. It’s what makes the torque, the torque


Old 02-02-2020, 07:52 PM
  #129  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 926
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I'll move in a heartbeat to the M340i if it means no more Audi lag.
Old 02-03-2020, 06:43 AM
  #130  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,421
Received 241 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slides
I'll move in a heartbeat to the M340i if it means no more Audi lag.
I guess you would hate the 911...



Quick Reply: BMW's new inline 6's are insane. The S5/RS5 really need a power bump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM.