Do we really believe that Audi can't put a power moonroof into this car?
11-26-2007, 09:35 AM
#11
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought it was a deal break for me, until I sat in S5. It made difference what soever. It would
be nice, and if they could have designed with the same size as the moonroof currently is, I'd be all for it. But, it ultimately doesn't bother me, not having drive select, hill hold assist, or lead taillights is alot more annoying, not the tail lights so much. The drive select and hill hold are huge.
11-26-2007, 10:53 AM
#13
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How would a sliding roof panel detract from the car's lines?
Sorry, but that makes no sense to me. Worst case scenario, they could have made the sliding panel body-colored rather than smoked glass. Still, nearly every other luxury car can be had with a power glass moonroof without "disturbing the lines"; so could the A5/S5. If nothing else, make it optional so the buyer can decide.
11-26-2007, 11:10 AM
#15
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Completely agree
I'm pissed off about Drive Select not being offered to US customers when it is available for other markets (Germany, Australia, etc). The technology is clearly ready to go and these cars are made at the same factory. I don't understand why we can't order it. And hill hold is a simple thing to offer as well since all other markets seem to have it. I don't get it.
11-26-2007, 01:58 PM
#17
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe something to do with our laws, I don't know, but it's bugging the hell out of me.
Women spills a cup of hot coffee on her lap, and McD's gets blamed for her being a clutz and burning herself. This is what we get. No drive select or hill hold.
