Ugh...I already don't like it
03-17-2009, 05:06 AM
#11
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeh! six years on this forum and over a thousand post and I'm still a 'Junior' member. What's it take?
And where's my sig pic?
Why is my post time 1:06 pm? It's 9:06 am here.
And...
Ahah!
That's a limitation.
And where's my sig pic?
Why is my post time 1:06 pm? It's 9:06 am here.
And...
You last visited: 12-31-1969 at 11:00 PM
Your signature contains too many lines and must be shortened. You may only have up to 8 line(s). Long text may have been implicitly wrapped, causing it to be counted as multiple lines.
Last edited by rmccomiskie; 03-17-2009 at 05:13 AM.
03-17-2009, 05:11 AM
#12
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I liked the way the old forum allowed you to look down the page and immediately see how many & whom had responded to a question. Also if someone snuck an answer in the middle it stood out because it wasn’t highlighted. I don’t see this as an improvement at all, it just isn’t as user friendly. Can we have the old deal back ? ~ John Buchtenkirch
03-17-2009, 05:13 AM
#13
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hammer 10
I liked the way the old forum allowed you to look down the page and immediately see how many & whom had responded to a question.
Originally Posted by hammer 10
Also if someone snuck an answer in the middle it stood out because it wasn’t highlighted.
Originally Posted by hammer 10
I don’t see this as an improvement at all, it just isn’t as user friendly. Can we have the old deal back ? ~ John Buchtenkirch
03-17-2009, 06:21 AM
#15
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PS Dave, your address still the same?? Check your post
Cheers
Corne
03-17-2009, 06:49 AM
#16
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The new forum is great...it should've used to a php format long, long ago!
The only downside is that the crappy old format didn't translate real well (ie. FAQs) Far better useability with this php though.
The only downside is that the crappy old format didn't translate real well (ie. FAQs) Far better useability with this php though.
03-17-2009, 08:55 AM
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally!
I'm sorry, I've been working with computer for years and I always thought the old forum was an unacceptable format.
I don't want to sound rude or out of place in anyway, but you cannot complain about the FAQ.
It was structured in a bad way from the start, come on... replying to a post to add an entry? No way.
It should have been a thread with a post on each argument (engine, brakes, ...) collecting links to threads. No wonder it's all broken now.
Someone must open a new FAQ thread, ask the moderators to make it sticky (always at the top of the board), and start putting back things.
There are a number of things still to be fixed.
I'm sorry, I've been working with computer for years and I always thought the old forum was an unacceptable format.
I don't want to sound rude or out of place in anyway, but you cannot complain about the FAQ.
It was structured in a bad way from the start, come on... replying to a post to add an entry? No way.
It should have been a thread with a post on each argument (engine, brakes, ...) collecting links to threads. No wonder it's all broken now.
Someone must open a new FAQ thread, ask the moderators to make it sticky (always at the top of the board), and start putting back things.
There are a number of things still to be fixed.
03-17-2009, 09:21 AM
#18
Finally!
I'm sorry, I've been working with computer for years and I always thought the old forum was an unacceptable format.
I don't want to sound rude or out of place in anyway, but you cannot complain about the FAQ.
It was structured in a bad way from the start, come on... replying to a post to add an entry? No way.
It should have been a thread with a post on each argument (engine, brakes, ...) collecting links to threads. No wonder it's all broken now.
Someone must open a new FAQ thread, ask the moderators to make it sticky (always at the top of the board), and start putting back things.
There are a number of things still to be fixed.
I'm sorry, I've been working with computer for years and I always thought the old forum was an unacceptable format.
I don't want to sound rude or out of place in anyway, but you cannot complain about the FAQ.
It was structured in a bad way from the start, come on... replying to a post to add an entry? No way.
It should have been a thread with a post on each argument (engine, brakes, ...) collecting links to threads. No wonder it's all broken now.
Someone must open a new FAQ thread, ask the moderators to make it sticky (always at the top of the board), and start putting back things.
There are a number of things still to be fixed.
I under stand they are trying to move the forum forward but if the majority of the users don't want it they why force it.. New doesn't always mean better, yeah you might get fancy features( just like our cars) but build quality sucks.
