Wetterauer. The magazine tested the Wett chip as well as Hoppens', TAPs', and someone else's. The wett chip came away with top honors. I forget who came in second, but then again that usually is the case isn't it. The article is pretty informative with diagrams and everything. <p>Jeremy <br>1.8TQ Wett, Remus

Could you be a little more specific in terms of the name of the mag., which issue (month) ect. thanks in advance.<br>

This is the European Car magazine article in May 1998. The winner was TAP, not Wetterauer.

PJ.. send me address and I'll forward the article to you.

TAP and Hoppen were recommended, read the last two paragraphs

i'm not pj but i'm interested in info on chips - thx

They weren't recommended, no chips were actually recommended, genious. The dynamometer shows the true story. You get what you pay for and for the horsepower per dollar with the amount of horsepower you do get, wett is clearly the choice.<br>

Sorry wrong magazine it wasn't EC. It was Street Power and it's the spring 1999 issue.<br>

The same article has appeared in May 1998 EC, Nov 1998 VW Trends, Spring 1999 Street Power<br>

ACTUALLY THE WETT AND TAP POWERBANDS ARE THE WORST OF THE 4 TESTED. AND IF YOU TALK DOLLAR PER HORSEPOWER THEN NEUSPEED, WHICH WASN'T TESTED, IS THE REAL WINNER.

Actually the best HP per dollar is the Neuspeed chip--but the did not test it.