faust92
01-23-2008, 01:07 PM
<ul><li><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html">http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html</a</li></ul>
|
|
|
|
View Full Version : Petition to get Warner not to go off HD-DVD. faust92 01-23-2008, 01:07 PM <ul><li><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html">http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html</a</li></ul> Rubberduckie 01-23-2008, 01:17 PM Heh-heh. faust92 01-23-2008, 01:22 PM larryV 01-23-2008, 01:24 PM Why on earth would you want to prolong this stupid format war any longer unless you really want both formats to die? It's over, blu-ray won. Let hd-dvd die a quick, painless, and peaceful death already. Is hd-dvd fanboism that hard to kick? or are you secretly favoring digital distribution over the internet/cable/satellite providers? fourwheelslide 01-23-2008, 02:00 PM Devius 01-23-2008, 02:02 PM <ul><li><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/22/blu-ray-players-grab-93-percent-of-market-after-warner-went-blu/">It's a wrap</a></li></ul> SAC-CA-GTI 01-23-2008, 02:08 PM skidmark 01-23-2008, 05:28 PM irish21 01-24-2008, 05:39 AM Such a thing does exist. Found it at high def digest. Not as many signatures, though. Maybe we should worry.<ul><li><a href="http://Let%20HD%20DVD%20die%20petition">http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?HDVDeath</a></li></ul> skidmark 01-24-2008, 07:11 AM differently. Just think if they would have started with the $99 players from the get go. meisterkleef 01-24-2008, 08:34 AM LuvnhatemyA6 01-24-2008, 09:32 AM LuvnhatemyA6 01-24-2008, 09:33 AM irish21 01-24-2008, 10:50 AM irish21 01-24-2008, 10:52 AM I love that all the HD DVD guys who insist that the Paramount switch was based on merits also insist that the BDA paid off Warner. Devius 01-24-2008, 11:23 AM meisterkleef 01-24-2008, 01:21 PM skidmark 01-24-2008, 03:30 PM irish21 01-25-2008, 05:33 AM BD technical advantages: Capacity? Check Bandwidth? Check Durability? Check HD-DVD technical advantages: HDi vs. BD-J: Check (currently) Price is not a technical advantage irish21 01-25-2008, 06:45 AM And hardness is measurable, and by all accounts it is much harder to scratch a BD disc than an HD DVD. Look, the two most important things for a media device are the amount of storage capacity and the ability to read data. BD wins in both categories. HD DVD currently had better interactive features, including special features and online. What am I missing? irish21 01-25-2008, 07:01 AM They had to develop a special hardcoating because the data layer is so much closer to the surface. By all accounts, it works. The first prototype discs actually had a cartridge. You've never heard of this?<ul><li><a href="http://www.news.com/Try-scratching-this-DVD/2100-1041_3-5455621.html">CNET article</a></li></ul> irish21 01-25-2008, 07:42 AM Note: the disk in question is one of the 200 GB prototype discs, but was treated with the same TDK product that is on all BDs.<ul><li><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/19/tdks-durabis-2-coating-protects-200gb-blu-ray-discs/">Engadet article</a></li></ul> |