JSC
11-10-1999, 08:31 AM
I love the old 900s; our '89 has 134k on it, burns not a drop of oil, and is still in good shape. I hope the A4 does as well for as long.
Having said that, I wouldn't touch the new GM Saabs: too many stories of poor quality control (timing belts & clutch cables going at ridiculous rates, having to change timing belt every 30k on early GM 900s), and my friend who owns a body shop says there has been a real decline in the vault like solidity of the older (up thru '93) 900 body structure.
Never even considered a new Saab when getting my A4; I've been too spoiled by the older ones; less refined but more solid and reliable (cost note: our '89 900 had more repair incidents but much lower routine maintenance costs than our '90 Integra [few repairs, very expensive routine maint.] so the overall cost of operating the Saab was/is the lowest of the 4-5 cars we've had over the past 12 yrs.)
Having said that, I wouldn't touch the new GM Saabs: too many stories of poor quality control (timing belts & clutch cables going at ridiculous rates, having to change timing belt every 30k on early GM 900s), and my friend who owns a body shop says there has been a real decline in the vault like solidity of the older (up thru '93) 900 body structure.
Never even considered a new Saab when getting my A4; I've been too spoiled by the older ones; less refined but more solid and reliable (cost note: our '89 900 had more repair incidents but much lower routine maintenance costs than our '90 Integra [few repairs, very expensive routine maint.] so the overall cost of operating the Saab was/is the lowest of the 4-5 cars we've had over the past 12 yrs.)