View Full Version : Your suspicions confirmed:


ZCD2.7T
09-19-2007, 05:42 AM
"When (traffic) gets bad in Chicago, it gets REALLY bad"

"New report says Chicago region is heavy on congestion, light on solutions
Chicago region's commutes get more wasteful -- of time, money

By Jon Hilkevitch and Richard Wronski | Tribune staff reporters
September 19, 2007

A national study showing traffic congestion worsening in the Chicago region prompted urban planners to warn Tuesday that solutions to gridlock will remain elusive until elected officials and the public rally behind new strategies.

Ideas that have helped manage traffic in cities from London to New York include expansion of toll roads, peak-hour travel fees to encourage some people to hit the road at less-busy times, mass-transit improvements like point-to-point express bus service and creating public-private partnerships to help pay for new infrastructure.

But as traffic continues to build up and back up on Illinois roads, state lawmakers and the governor are engaged in a fight over whether to impose tax increases and add gambling casinos as the linchpin of financing transportation.


"Here we are beyond the 11th hour struggling to get by without a new [state] capital program to address congestion in northeastern Illinois and facing another mass-transit doomsday," said Tom Murtha, senior planner for strategic initiatives at the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning.

"What we need to do is convince people that there are real solutions that move traffic at higher speeds and help pay for the gains as well," Murtha said.

Proponents say by taking a diverse approach to the problem, many untapped options are available to squeeze additional capacity out of the existing transportation systems instead of going directly to the most expensive and slowest alternative of building new roads.

The "low-hanging fruit" that hasn't been fully picked ranges from doing a better job coordinating traffic signals to restricting the volume of traffic trying to enter already packed expressways to moving vehicles faster on the road by reducing the number of drivers and increasing the ranks of bus and train customers.

Amid the stalemate over what course to plot in Illinois, a national study released Tuesday found commuters face increasingly unpredictable travel times for the trips they make every day in the Chicago region and northwest Indiana.

The Chicago area has consistently ranked as one of the most gridlocked U.S. metropolitan regions on a variety of criteria used to measure congestion, travel delays and the capacity to handle more traffic, said the study, the "2007 Urban Mobility Report," issued by the Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M University.

For the fourth straight year, the Chicago region and northwest Indiana ranked second worst for the amount of extra time commuters must add to their trips due to traffic delays.

The Los Angeles metro area, including Long Beach and Santa Ana, was first for urban areas with populations of more than 3 million. After Chicago, San Francisco-Oakland, New York-Newark and Miami round out the top five.

The study's authors noted excessive fluctuations in how long it takes Chicago-area residents to commute, requiring people to as much as double the time they allow for peak-hour trips.

"When things get bad in Chicago, they get really bad," said David Schrank, an associate research scientist at the Texas Transportation Institute who co-wrote the mobility report.

Wasted time and fuel cost the Chicago region $4 billion annually, Schrank said.

Transportation and urban planning experts said the release of the report comes at an opportune time for Illinois.

"The first thing this report reinforces is the need for the legislature and the governor to resolve the transit crisis," said William Baltutis, executive director of the Transportation Management Association of Lake-Cook. "It's one more reason why we need a long-term funding resolution for mass transit."

The association works with Pace, Metra and businesses to promote wider use of shuttles and van pools to connect workers with commuter trains. Shuttle Bug ridership increased 8.5 percent from 2005 to 2006, Baltutis said.

A consensus has emerged among transportation professionals that building more roads is not the solution.

Michael Bolton, deputy executive director at Pace, predicts that when the 12.5-mile extension of Interstate Highway 355 in Will County opens in November, it will be immediately clogged with vehicles stretching from Interstate Highway 55 to Interstate Highway 80.

Lower-cost alternatives to going on a construction binge include using expressway shoulders to carry traffic during peak hours; changing the traffic flow of arterial streets during certain hours to serve traffic entering and exiting the downtown; and operating express buses.

Other ideas in the planning stage in the Chicago region include running more commuter trains to serve reverse-commuters who work in the suburbs; using technology to more efficiently manage traffic lanes to minimize congestion; modernizing the freight rail infrastructure to make room for more passenger trains; promoting land-use policies that encourage use of mass transit; and adding bicycling routes.

The price of going with the status quo would make today's congestion seem like the good old days, the experts warned.

Chicago-area commuters already lose a total of more than 203 million hours a year in traffic delays, the Texas Transportation Institute study found. Los Angeles and New York had the highest annual delays. Following Chicago were Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington and Miami.

The Chicago area has held the No. 3 ranking in the highest annual delay category since 1991. But the extra time spent commuting due to delays for each individual traveler during peak hours was 30 hours per year back in 1991. In 2005, the figure was 46 hours -- the equivalent of a work week -- per person, the study said.

All the new statistics were based on 2005 data, the most recent available.

The Chicago region retained its No. 3 ranking in other categories as well. Area travelers each used an additional 32 gallons of fuel each year due to traffic congestion, wasting 142 million gallons annually.

----------

jhilkevitch@tribune.com

rwronski@tribune.com"

This is probably my least favorite thing about living in Chicago. Winter weather's not too much fun, either, but it's temporary, while traffic is constant.

Blech.

520
09-19-2007, 07:44 AM
Few situations.....

1/ car pulled over on the side of the road, in your direction - how many of you slow down to "see" what is all about?

2/ accident on the opposite side of the highway - how many of you slow down to "see" what happened?

3/ 3 lanes merging into 2. You see signs well ahead but you continue to travel in 3rd lane until the very end instead of merging into second lane while traffic carries the speed. or, you are in the 2nd lane and refuse to allow room for others in 3rd lane to merge?

Seriously, how many times did any of you do this - answer honestly....all that will stop the traffic.

JustAdam
09-19-2007, 08:26 AM
We just have lots of people here, even if none of us did any of these things, someone out there would and that would be enough to slow it down.

bradford
09-19-2007, 09:23 AM
<center><img src="http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/snaps_actor_david-herman.jpg"></center><p>"Why should I change my name? He's the one who sucks."

bradford
09-19-2007, 09:25 AM
My ultimate pet peeve is when traffic is flowing at the speed limit but there's a cop with his lights on up ahead on the side of the road. Traffic slows down about 20mph to about 35.

WTF - WHY ARE YOU BRAKING WHEN YOU'RE NOT SPEEDING IN THE FIRST PLACE??? ARRRRRRRRRRRGH

520
09-19-2007, 09:36 AM

520
09-19-2007, 09:38 AM
Now tell me, why do you need to slow down to see who was pulled over? Mind your own damn business and drive! When you slow down, stepping on the brakes ever so slightly causes the guy behind you to brake even more, and so on....you can see how that quickly translates into a complete stop few cars down behind you. Once that happens it just starts piling up.

JustAdam
09-19-2007, 09:52 AM

TonyPNS
09-19-2007, 11:42 AM

ZCD2.7T
09-19-2007, 12:25 PM

911eric
09-19-2007, 01:56 PM

skabaru
09-19-2007, 09:15 PM
I agree those things cause backups, but those are far from the major offenders.

I think it is the drivers, sure... but even if it was a bunch of 'us' driving, there is a theoritical limit to the number of cars, and at rush hour, I think those are attained.

I think the bigger problem is that of lane etiquette and paying attention... NOTHING pisses me off more that 3 cars all locked at the same speed and a large gap in front of them. ****, I hate gaps at all.

THAT is what makes light traffic congested traffic.

520
09-19-2007, 09:46 PM

520
09-19-2007, 09:49 PM
Imagine 2&gt;1 merge. Left lane speed is 60. Right lane is 60. Instead of simply moving over inbetween the cars, assuming left lane drives keep distance and allow right laners to come in, everybody in the left lane can keep moving at 60mph and continue on. That's why they put signs saying merge 2 miles ahead or something like that. Sometimes they screw up though and let you know when its too late, then one brakes and rest is history.
I think.