I had a 98 2.8QMS that was totalled in the flood. So now we're looking to replace it, and thinking about maybe the 2000 1.8 instead. I thought the only differences btwn the 2.8 and
1.8 were the engine and trim, but Edmunds lists the 60-0 stopping distance of the 28 as 134, and the 1.8 is 139. Does the 1.8 have different brakes?

Also, the clutch felt different on the 1.8 (I've seen this discussed here before).

So -- are there other differences btwn the 1.8 and 2.8 besides engine and trim?

Thanks.

-Scott

...the 1.8t and 2.8 have exactly the same braking system. All else being equal, they should stop in about the same distance. Whether the extra weight up front in the 2.8 over the front wheels is a slight advantage or the overall weight savings and less front end sqat under hard braking of the 1.8t is of benefit one way or the other remains an open question. Either way it shouldn't make that much of a difference.

I believe the 2.8 also has a slighter larger clutch plate. I haven't really heard of many clutch failures of higher mileage chipped 1.8ts and unless you're launching at 3,000 rpm every time it may just be a moot point as well.

Best,
Jeff J

2.8 has better tires than 1.8 and that could make the difference in stopping.

By getting better tires for your 1.8 you should have same or better stopping since 1.8 is little lighter.