A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C6 Audi A6 produced from 2004-present and Audi S6 produced from 2007 - 2011

Lookin for 2006-2007 A6Q Info needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2009, 10:58 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Bariukas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 4.2 vs 3.0T

Originally Posted by ESN
non-FSI has smaller output. Either 4.2 > 3.2, IMHO.
How do you like your new 3.0T?
Compare it 4.2 engine.
Old 09-08-2009, 03:42 PM
  #12  
AudiWorld Super User
 
KevinGary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 9,709
Received 884 Likes on 723 Posts
Default

The stock power numbers for the 40-valve 4.2 vs. the 32-valve FSI 4.2 are:

40 Valve------------------------------32 Valve
335 hp @ 6,600 ---------------------350 hp @ 6,800
310 lbs ft @ 3,500 ------------------325 lbs ft @ 3,500

If you have a Unitronic flash performed the numbers become:

355 hp --------------------------------378 hp
329 lbs ft -----------------------------347 lbs ft
Old 09-08-2009, 11:55 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Super User
 
A6Gary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 6,834
Received 171 Likes on 150 Posts
Default I test drove a '04 A6 2.7L and a '05 A6 3.2L back–to–back for comparison...

Because the C5 was so similar to my '96 A6 FWD Avant, and the C6 was much larger than either the C4 or C5, I eventually ended up with a '06 A6 Avant that came off a 3-yr lease last year. The car was equipped with the adaptive air suspension, NAV, and tech/prem/cold weather packages. The 3.2L FSI V6 has plenty of power to move the heavier Avamt, so the sedan will be slightly faster and get slightly better fuel economy. I have found that the air suspension is beneficial to keep from scrapping the bottom of the front bumper cover due to its very low clearance. The air suspension also allows you, if you choose, to have the feel of the sport suspension that comes with the S–Line package, or set it back to the comfort level. So, based on my experience for the last year of C6 ownership, I would recommend the adapative air suspension as one of the things to look for, even though it may have mainentance issues down the road.

I wouold also recommend the '07 over the '06 as the '07 was the best year for features of the C6 platform to date, e.g., advance parktronic w/ camera, front seat storage bins, headlight washers, etc. In '08, Audi removed the front seat storage bins (and dropped the headlight washers I believe) to lower the production cost.
Old 09-09-2009, 08:47 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
r1racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A6Gary
Because the C5 was so similar to my '96 A6 FWD Avant, and the C6 was much larger than either the C4 or C5, I eventually ended up with a '06 A6 Avant that came off a 3-yr lease last year. The car was equipped with the adaptive air suspension, NAV, and tech/prem/cold weather packages. The 3.2L FSI V6 has plenty of power to move the heavier Avamt, so the sedan will be slightly faster and get slightly better fuel economy. I have found that the air suspension is beneficial to keep from scrapping the bottom of the front bumper cover due to its very low clearance. The air suspension also allows you, if you choose, to have the feel of the sport suspension that comes with the S–Line package, or set it back to the comfort level. So, based on my experience for the last year of C6 ownership, I would recommend the adapative air suspension as one of the things to look for, even though it may have mainentance issues down the road.

I wouold also recommend the '07 over the '06 as the '07 was the best year for features of the C6 platform to date, e.g., advance parktronic w/ camera, front seat storage bins, headlight washers, etc. In '08, Audi removed the front seat storage bins (and dropped the headlight washers I believe) to lower the production cost.

The 06 and 07's have parktronic, front seat storage bins, and headlight washers.
Old 09-09-2009, 08:47 AM
  #15  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
r1racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

And the 05's.
Old 09-09-2009, 04:34 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
mystrodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NW USA
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've got Adaptive Air Suspension and have had virtually zero problems..I read allot about the A8 since it comes standard with AAS and actually never found a negative post in the forums on that system going back to 05 so I was convinced it was a solid. The C6 series A6 learned and fixed the few issues the C5 had and by 06 it went way up in consumer ratings in reliability. The wonderful 3.2 FSI can get amazing fuel mileage I might add..on long drives with varying roads but mostly freeway I averaged 28mpg using cruise. I'd bet the 4.2 will get excellent MPG also mainly because of the great transmission and gearing but the 3.2 will also surprise you with it's great torque especially when I (rarely) use the paddle wheels..it seems to really hit the mark around 3500..then shoots to RL before you know it and your so far past the speed limit you'd better do some quick thinking and make sure that radar is working! but.. I usually drive it like it really is..a world class AWD luxury car and enjoy the hell out of it knowing what it's capible of. 07's are comming off leases..that would be a good choice and save you a bundle and mainly BE PATIENT.
Old 09-12-2009, 08:57 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
jazznuts699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

get a 4.2 you will not regret... many (not all) who have gotten the 3.2 wish they would have gotten the 4.2 had they done it all over again...

if you're really worried about gas mileage get a TDI engine audi. the a6 is heavy thus you lose big time on gas mileage.

the fun factor of a 4.2 > 3.2 IMHO

you should be able to pickup an 07 4.2 for around or under 30K with CPO ...
Old 09-12-2009, 09:50 PM
  #18  
RDD
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
RDD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the 3.2 but on the highway it makes all its torque in 3rd gear but usually if you leave it in D or even S mode it will only drop down to 4th gear when you floor it so I've been switching mine manually to 3rd gear. It is not hard to go fast in either car. I test drove the 4.2 and the power comes on more easily and effortlessly but I wouldn't say it felt that much faster (even though it is faster). You have to decide if you want to spend the extra $$$ for the V8. One thing that I do really like about the V8 is the sound.

If you want a real kick in the pants big sedan you'd have to go AMG/M5. Even the S6 with the V10 lambo engine has been criticized for not being that fast.
Old 09-13-2009, 02:11 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Super User
 
KevinGary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 9,709
Received 884 Likes on 723 Posts
Default

I agree with Jazz, you won't regret the 4.2 and you may regret the 3.2 if you like power. In addition, if you find a 4.2 it will likely be better optioned since it came with more items standard and if the original owner opted for the cost of a 4.2 they may have also opted for some of the remaining options.
Old 09-15-2009, 07:52 AM
  #20  
ESN
Elder Member
 
ESN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default haven't broken in the 3.0T yet so too soon

to fully compare, but the 3.0T is plenty peppy off the line, with quicker throttle respnse than the 4.2 FSI. And it doesn't hold first gear when cold like the 4.2 does, so I no longer need to manually upshift in the morning. Also plenty of torque for highway passing, but I've yet to go WOT so I really can't tell the ultimate difference. It's certainly easy enough to go triple digits even w/o exceeding 4,000 RPM.

The super charger sounds nice enough, but it doesn't match that V8 burble. Oh, well, presumably my milage will be better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
muski
A7
0
06-27-2011 04:53 PM
schalliol
A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion
1
07-21-2008 08:22 PM
Tarmac101
A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion
24
01-20-2007 04:28 AM
Fred
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
9
09-27-1999 06:16 PM
Misc. Models Discussion
0
08-11-1999 07:48 PM



Quick Reply: Lookin for 2006-2007 A6Q Info needed



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM.