new a6 owner
#21
Drove an E63 AMG. Purely offing amazing....nothing Audi makes is even close. Even the R8...the quattro just makes the R8 so tame. Every time I touch the gas pedal it's a giggle...except for the tire wear; probably worse than an M6 V10.
There is no substitute for cubic inches except cubic dollars.
There is no substitute for cubic inches except cubic dollars.
#22
AudiWorld Super User
And I would observe such a beastie is unobtainium in the North American market...it's an avant as well.
The E63s are available at heckuva discount for cars that cost that much new.
The E63s are available at heckuva discount for cars that cost that much new.
#23
#24
Audiworld Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
update on my ride
installed miltek exhaust
got the 034 motorsports carbonfiber ram intake
installing intake and forge splitter valves
working on getting together the c5 to c6 conversion.
installed miltek exhaust
got the 034 motorsports carbonfiber ram intake
installing intake and forge splitter valves
working on getting together the c5 to c6 conversion.
#25
wow are you serious, you should have just gotten a C6. but i do like the intake a little, I just dont see how it can possibly be ram though..
and I dont think ram would even matter for a 2.7T, do you really think that the psi from the "rammed" air will really be higher than what the ecu asks from the turbos, or even have any effect on the turbos or the boost? I dont think so... your just making the car less aerodynamic...
and I dont think ram would even matter for a 2.7T, do you really think that the psi from the "rammed" air will really be higher than what the ecu asks from the turbos, or even have any effect on the turbos or the boost? I dont think so... your just making the car less aerodynamic...
#27
Audiworld Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow are you serious, you should have just gotten a C6. but i do like the intake a little, I just dont see how it can possibly be ram though..
and I dont think ram would even matter for a 2.7T, do you really think that the psi from the "rammed" air will really be higher than what the ecu asks from the turbos, or even have any effect on the turbos or the boost? I dont think so... your just making the car less aerodynamic...
and I dont think ram would even matter for a 2.7T, do you really think that the psi from the "rammed" air will really be higher than what the ecu asks from the turbos, or even have any effect on the turbos or the boost? I dont think so... your just making the car less aerodynamic...
#29
Audiworld Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, how about ive been modifying cars for allmost 10 years and i like changing the way cars look. i allready have a 2004 2.7t audi and i love every thing about it but i like that kit to change the front end. all my cars a paid off also, if i want a car payment i could probably get a 2008 s5
#30
people are giving you a hard time because conversion kits can be done wrong..... that being siad it looks like your going in the right direction, jut dont cheap out on the paint job
also, that air intake you have really was a waste of money, you could have kept the stock airbox and just put a cone filter on the end, would have gotten you the same results (and cool sound effect) for a lot less cash. although i cant argue with how sexy it looks with the hood open.
also, that air intake you have really was a waste of money, you could have kept the stock airbox and just put a cone filter on the end, would have gotten you the same results (and cool sound effect) for a lot less cash. although i cant argue with how sexy it looks with the hood open.